In Chapter 111 on page 525, Melville wrote “The waves should rise and fall, and ebb and flow unceasingly…” It was part of a sentence, but what caught my eye is the word “should.” Why “should”? Why not “will” or “can”? But as I read further, I realized that this explains the inevitability of life itself. It is the only part of the full sentence that sounds rhythmic, like how waves themselves move. The word “unceasingly” simply means “eternal.” In other words, the waves move eternally. Adding the implication, Melville presenting the sea as a symbol of constant motion also becomes how life is in constant motion.
“The waves should rise and fall” suggests the ups and downs of life. It’s basically not normal for an entire lifespan to be completely calm and serene. It’s okay to be sad. It’s okay to be happy. We have emotions so we can experience life like a rollercoaster, or rather a storm in a voyage. Mistakes are made to teach. Failures and setbacks show flaws. You can strive for the calm and serene, but the journey to get there will never be.
“Ebb and flow” suggests a cycle of experiences. Many things can restart, many things can be relived. The most vivid example is the damning fact Moby Dick teaches you how to read after already knowing how to read. The phrase “ebb and flow” shows how life teaches: even with everything you have learned, there’s still thousands more to know.
Why Melville consciously chose “should” and nothing else is because life “should” rise and fall, ebb and flow, as you grow as a person.
Hi Zach ,Capulong,
I really like how you connected Melville’s use of “should” to the rhythm and motion of life itself. Your interpretation of the waves as metaphor for emotional ups and downs feels very natural and insightful. It shows how Melville’s language captures the unpredictability of human experience. I especially like your reminder that mistakes and setbacks ate part of that motion it gives the passage a hopeful, reflective meaning .
Great blog, post and comment on it. Do you think that this ebb and flow, the cyclical movement, is it odds with Ahab’s singular focus and linear plan? In other words, is a novel suggesting that ebb and flow is more natural and correct than a singular obsession?