Melville was a genius (and maybe a time traveler)

After reading the article, “What ‘Moby-Dick’ Means to Me” by Philip Hoare, I’m convinced that Herman Melville was a genius who was way ahead of his time (which is why he could also be a time traveler). This article really gave me great insight into the novel and Melville himself, and learning of the influence that the novel has far after Melville passed away shows that his work has clearly reached across many different generations. It was fascinating to learn that a prow had to be built on the pulpit in the New Bedford Bethel because of how many people were expecting it to be there after reading Moby-Dick. The amount of detail that is contained within the novel is also something I’ve heard so much about, both in this article and in class, and it really shows how much effort Melville put into his piece of art.

In the article, Hoare writes, “To my mind, there are only two other works with which it bears comparison: Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’ (1818), and Emily Brontë’s ‘Wuthering Heights’ (1847). The former, in its own witness to one man’s obsessive interference with nature, was a direct influence on Melville.” Obsession with nature and the idea of conquering it has been and always will be in human nature. I’m sure Melville’s own experiences bled through the novel, and there’s no doubt that his work in a way served somewhat as a response to his journeys on the sea.

I think what fascinated me most in this article, was learning about how Moby-Dick wasn’t truly appreciated until decades after Melville’s death. “In 1923, D. H. Lawrence published his idiosyncratic, if not faintly crazy, ‘Studies in Classic American Literature.’ Lawrence proclaimed Melville to be ‘a futurist long before futurism found paint,’ the author of “one of the strangest and most wonderful books in the world.” The words “a futurist long before futurism found paint,” really stick out to me as it shows how Melville was able to write a novel whose words can be reached long after it’s publishing year. To learn about his genius and his ability to create work that can be appreciated for over a century, as well as seeing themes of his novel still being prevalent in the modern world, really excites me to begin reading Moby-Dick.

2 thoughts on “Melville was a genius (and maybe a time traveler)

  1. Glad you are excited here, Jimmy, and I think your sly focus on time travel is important. Let’s consider, together this semester, the role of literature as human record, as archive, and thus as a means of history and of time travel….

  2. Hi Jimmy,

    I completely agree with your sentiment about how Melville was incredibly ahead of his time and a genius (I say this before actually reading and getting frustrated with the novel, though). In my post, I also touched on how fascinating all of the details Melville put into his novel are. The details help us, as readers outside of Melville’s time, to revisit his time and perspective in history with accurate, vivid details. Additionally, your perspective on the elements and influences of nature in Shelley’s work is really insightful, especially considering last week’s discussion on nature and the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *