Close reading a body of water.

This past weekend I took a trip south to Ensenada Mexico and it was a beautiful scenic drive down the Baja Californian coast. It has been 15 years since I was last able to visit the country in which I was born and even more still since I made a trip along this part of the coast. As I witnessed the setting sun illuminate the sea with gold light and paint the mountains in red I thought about how much I have changed since I was last there. I was a young girl and now I am a 30 year old woman. I look at this body of water where the concept of borders is simply an impossibility and I my first instinct is to think it unchanged. But that’s not true, the coastline has changed. The buildings along the coast used to be sparse. Now, across large stretches I see the sprouting of construction, all in varied states of progress. Some buildings that were never finished, left with gaping holes showing rusting innards of steel. The sea air has already started to consume them. Here and there are boulders that have fallen from the seaside cliffs. All this time, the sea has not stopped its process of erosion. It’s changed though in ways more imperceptive than my own. Of course my change is more pronounced, it is a finite amount of time that i’ll inhabit this world. But the sea has been here since times inmemorial. I feel humbled as the sun finally vanishes and the sea withdraws into darkness.

Final week

Both of the classes I have taken with Professor Pressman have been so unique to my experience in English classrooms. Both times I have noticed tangible improvement on my writing skills and I get a better sense of my voice in academic writing. At the end of each semester I finish with a feeling that I have experienced a transformation in myself. This particular semester I also came to appreciate the collective work we all contributed to the classroom. My comprehension was expanded by hearing everyone’s different responses to the same text. I only wish that I can keep finding my way in classrooms like this one. I also have a desire to find and connect with people that also like to think and create meaning based on the art of others.

Final Proposal

I am proposing an essay analyzing how Melville’s Moby Dick is in conversation with Emersons transcendentalist American Scholar. I believe that Melville intends to use his novel to teach us how to be analytical readers and he does so through the character of Ishmael whilst at the same time showing us his polar opposite through Captain Ahab. I am not entirely sure what second scholarly source will be but I am reading through some journals touching on the topics of the pedagogy of the book, art as a way to stimulate creation of the mind, and classification of animal intelligence compared to human intelligence. I am citing below the articles I am currently looking through.

Swails, Elizabeth Heinz. “Melville’s Thinking Animal and the Classification Conundrum.” ESQ: A Journal of Nineteenth-Century American Literature and Culture, vol. 66 no. 2, 2020, p. 325-363. Project MUSE

Assif, Adeena. “”The Dialogue of the Mind with Itself”: Freud, Cavell, and Company.” Common Knowledge, vol. 26 no. 1, 2020, p. 12-38. Project MUSEhttps://muse.jhu.edu/article/749019.

Ross, M. L. (1974). Moby-Dick as an Education. Studies in the Novel6, 62–75.

Week 13

I want to explore the quote “A whaleship was my Yale college and my Harvard” along with the character of the pale usher. I feel very strongly that Melville puts so much effort into teaching the reader how to read because it’s also how we learn to read the world but he is also stressing that the reader should not assume that all knowledge is to be found in books, through words that someone else has written. It is also important to have a strong connection to the natural world around us. The train of thought needs to be fleshed out more but I do want to find scholarly articles about transcendentalism to tie into my essay.

Essay two

In page 532 of chapter 113, The Forge, we see the full manifestation of Ahab’s obsession for revenge and the lengths that he is willing to go to assuage his madness. The text says of Ahab, “No, No–no water for that, I want it of the true death-temper…Three punctures were made in the heathen flesh, and the White Whale’s barbs were even tempered. ‘Ergo non Baptizo te in nomine patris, sed in nomine diaboli!’ Deliriously howled Ahab, as the malignant iron scorchingly devoured the baptismal blood.” There is a very overt subversion of Christian tradition that critiques the institution of power. Its effect is that it calls out the institution of christianity as self righteous. This is a valuable commentary especially in a moment in time in which christianity is being used both to argue against the practice of slavery and for the continuation of slavery.

It is significant that Ahab opposes the tempering of the harpoon with water. Water is symbol of cleansing and purifying, in the tradition of baptism it symbolizes the cleansing of a persons sins. Ahab, however, is not interested in having a weapon clean of sin; that is not the purpose of the weapon. Instead he wants a pact of violence symbolized in blood. This could have been the full extent of the act but Ahab does not want the harpoon tempered with his blood. He wants it done so with pagan blood. This could be a deliberate affront to the institution of christianity which automatically see inherent evil in paganism but the book makes it clear that this is not necessarily Melville’s stance on the subject. Though Ishmael considers himself a Christian man, his best friend on the ship is the pagan Queequeg. What we have seen throughout the text is that these three harpooners come from distinct cultures that are not inherently evil, they are simply different. It is Ahab’s direct action of tempering the harpoon in pagan blood that ascribes malice to the whole act. The reader could also read this as an act of exploitation. Ahab picks them out because they are the best harpooners in the ship and he wants his instrument imbued with the blood of the most gifted and so he makes a demand of their blood. In fact, the text says “the malignant iron schorchingly devoured the baptismal blood.” Blood is also a symbol for life or the soul so in a sense, Ahab is devouring these men for their bodily skill in whale hunting. Similarly, the black and brown body is being exploited and devoured in American land for the thirst of wealth and power.


Chapter 133: The Chase–First Day

I was taken by the very first two sentences in the chapter because of the description of Ahab’s physical reaction to literally smelling out the whale. “That night, in the mid-watch, when the old man-as his wont at times–stepped forth from the scuttle in which he leaned, and went to his pivot-hole he suddenly thrust out his face fiercely, snuffing up the sea air as a sagacious ship’s dog will, in drawing nigh to some barbarous isle. He declared that a whale must be near.” (Melville 594) The chapter begins while Ahab is in a moment of being lost in thought. The text reminds us that this is part of his usual nighttime habit. He is broken of thoughts because his senses are so deeply attuned to the hunting down of the whale and he is described in a doglike matter. Ahab goes from a moment of being in the midst of complex human thought and is suddenly taken over by a more animal like nature. This is further emphasized by the next line “snuffing up the air as a sagacious ship’s dog will, drawing nigh to some barbarous isle.” Melville says barbarous isle instead of simply saying land. The dog is called towards the place of wilderness as though by a primitive instinct. So to is Ahab led by that same primitive instinct to enact his revenge on the whale that is often described as an island. It is this need for revenge that has turned Ahab from a reasonable thinking human to into a more animal like figure. The book has been demanding that we learn to read and in reading these very physical sentences we can appreciate the lesson being imparted on us; Revenge can draw humans to a more baser nature that requires a certain loss of humanity.

Week 12: Queequeg in his coffin

“Now, at this time it was that my poor pagan companion, and fast bosom-friend, Queequeg, was seized with a fever, which brought him nigh to his endless end.” (519) This quote is interesting because Melville once again uses words that are in direct contradiction to each other. One of the first times that this is noted is in the introduction of Ahab when he is described as being a “grand, ungodly, god like man.” Just as this description of Ahab reflect the complexity and contradictory nature of the character, so too does the use of contradiction imply a similar complexity to the state in which Queequeg finds himself in. Queequeg is at the brink of death and this expression of endless end implies the permanence of the soul after death. As Ishmael stresses in this sentence, Queequeg is pagan and the common Christian belief is that his pagan soul is damned to existence in hell. The language in this quote does not indicate any doomed judgment of his soul. Queequeg is described as a companion and bosom friend to Ishmael and the reader it makes no sense to imagine that Ishmael thinks or fears for his friend’s soul. Melville uses the word endless to refer to the soul but he has also used this word to refer to the ocean. Thus, as readers, we can make the argument that in dying Queequeg is leaving mortality to become an immortal being something akin to an ocean in it’s vastness. This gives him a spirit like quality that is at interesting odds with the god like yet ultimately mortal Ahab. It’s worth bringing it up because Ishmael is once again showing the reader that he does not blindly follow the doctrine in which he was raised but rather lets his own lived experiences inform his own opinions in regards of the condition of the soul after death.

Chapter 74: The Sperm Whale’s Head

“But if his eyes were broad as the lens of Hershel’s great telescope; and his ears capacious as the porches of hearing? Not at all.—Why then do you try to “enlarge” your mind? Subtilize it.” (Melville 362)

I was interested in this quote because it comes about as Ishmael is pondering on the discrepancy between the size of the whale and the size of its sensory organs and wonders if they may be superior to humans for these differences. This quote makes the question philosophical in its nature; Does size equate to intelligence? The whale is certainly large in its scale, yet all it requires are eyes the size of a horse’s and an ear so small as to be overlooked by a less discerning eye. The whale’s design makes it clear that making these organs longer does not guarantee they will be more efficient. In a similar way, having a broad knowledge does not amount to much if we do not understand how to apply it effectively or how to pay attention to detail. Ishmael makes the observation that unless someone like a whaler gets up close and personal with a whale’s head someone with less experience might never find the ear. That is how small it is. It is not enough to have seen a drawing of a whale, or to have read all the books on cetology if when you stand before it you are unable to perceive such an important part of their physiognomy. Time and time again in this book, Melville continues to remind the reader do away with our preconceived notions of what makes someone learned and to consider the importance of direct contact and direct action.

Essay 1

Melville’s novel is peppered with chapters dedicated to illustrating the history of the various places that we inhabit throughout the book. I am focusing this essay on chapter 14 Nantucket; Particularly the exposition of the history of Nantucket. In the quote, Melville demonstrates an ongoing refusal to contribute to the erasure of the Native Americans of the land and how their contributions have been elemental in the construction of America. This passage struck me as important because Melville makes us, the readers, consider how the story of America is constructed and what is lost when truths are omitted.

The passage goes as follows: “Look now at the wondrous traditional story of how this island was settled by the red-men… in the olden times an eagle swooped down upon the New England coast, and carried off an infant Indian in his talons. With loud lament the parents saw their child borne out of sight over the wide waters. They resolved to follow in the same direction. Setting out in their canoes, after a perilous passage they discovered the island, and there they found an empty ivory casket, —the poor little Indian’s skeleton. What wonder, then, that these Nantucketers, born on the beach, should take to the sea for a livelihood! First they caught crabs and quohogs in the sand; grown bolder, they waded out with nets for more mackerel; more experienced, they pushed off in boats and captured cod; and at last, launching a navy of great ships on the sea, explored this watery world; put an incessant belt of circumnavigations round it…and in all seasons and all oceans declared everlasting war with the mightiest animated mass that has survived the flood; most monstrous and most mountainous! That Himmalehan, salt-sea mastodon,” (Melville 69-70)

The first point that I want to draw attention to is Melville’s command to the reader, “look now”. He uses it often throughout the novel when he wants the reader to pay particular mind to what he is about to say. It is the way that he emphasizes the importance of the picture he wishes to paint. With this in mind he immediately draws our attention to the next claim he makes. The story does not start with western settlement. The story begins with the settlement of the Native American on the island. In using the word ‘traditional’ to begin this story, he also does something very insteresting; he makes it clear to the reader that this is an old story that was passed down lines of generations. This claim denies the assumption that history begins when the western settlers arrive and commit the story into writing or any kind of physical permanence. He gives attributes the importance of oral tradition in creating history. I find this fascinating because the common myth that goes into creating American exceptionalism is that of a virgin and uninhabited land. That the western settlers arrived and set the land to work and produce for the building of their country. This idea would have us believe that the amount of natives present in the continent at the time of settler arrivals to be of little note. A number of so little significance as to be neglected. Within the first line, Melville dismantles this idea and posits the story of the stolen baby as a sort of origin story for all the inhabitants of nantucket, regardless of race.

I now turn my attention to the next point of interest in the excerpt. “In the olden times and eagle swooped down upon the new ngland coast and carried off an infant indian in its talons…”. He starts with the telling of a myth rather than any factual information. I think Melville understands that a history is not just built on facts but also on the mythologizing aspect. If his aim is to show the reader what a unique an powerful nation America has become then it also needs to have this mythologized history. Just like that of the founding of Rome or the founding of the Aztec empire. While he is using the modern day whalers to create this American mythology around, he is also including the founding story to create grandiosity through antiquity. In short, He claims that like other empires, America—though a young country— cannot be said to have no long history as a land. The story of Nantucket then, is a story borne out of search; much like the story of the settler search for a land of possibilities and opportunity that we have grown up with.

Week 7: Chapter 14 – Nantucket

This chapter struck my interest because Ishmael asks us, the reader, to pay attention to the history that has formed the island of Nantucket. “Look now,” he says, “ at the wondrous traditional story of how this island was settled by the red men.” (Pg 69) Like the earlier chapter, Melville keeps reminding us that there is a history here that far surpasses the establishment of the American nation. I find these constant reminders interesting because some of the earlier literature regarding the colonizing of the new world would have the reader believe that the land that settlers “discovered” was untouched and not being put to any kind of use. Melville constantly endeavors to remind us that it has been inhabited for hundreds of years. So much so that the native people have legends to explain how they came to discover the island of Nantucket. He further confirms the claim of the people of the island, not just to the land but to the sea itself. “They first caught crabs quohogs in the sand; grown bolder, they waded out with nets for mackerel; more experienced, they pushed of in boats and captured cod; and at last, launching a navy of great ships on the sea, explored this watery world; …”(pg 70). I bring attention to this quote because this description almost seems to describe a reverse evolution that slowly takes the locals of the island back to the sea as they adapt to survive it. Melville makes it clear that for a long time, the people of this island have become masters of the sea through their historical acquaintance with it. He likens it much to other historically distinguished empires like the roman empire. Considering how in his essay, The American Scholar, Emerson calls on scholars to stop looking towards Europe for inspiration, Melville seems to respond to this by making it clear that if we must look to the past, let us look to the past of this land and the past of the people that have long inhabited this land, for they were as great a people as those from across the ocean.