Final Thoughts

This class truly taught me a lot. I often leave courses feeling unsatisfied and feeling as if I wasted my time not having truly learned anything new. This class was the complete opposite. I came into this class with no expectations. i had never read Moby Dick before and was honestly just expecting to be in simply just another english class, but I truly couldn’t have been more wrong. This class opened my eyes in so many different ways. So often when I read I look at novels from such an objective perspective because that is the way in which I enjoy reading. However, this course truly made me develop such a profound appreciation for close reading an annotation. I think that appreciation came truly not from the novel, but from everyone in the class. The passion that Professor Pressman brought to the class was truly contagious and hearing the way people speak about chapters that I hadn’t even considered as important or impactful made me leave class every single day excited to come back. It has been quite an overwhelming semester for me with my workload both in and out of school and this course truly reinvigorated a spark that I thought was slowly dying. My love for reading has become rather intertwined and synonymous with my education every since I started college and that has been rather difficult for me. This class brought that love back because it essentially taught me to read again. It took me back to the start and made me fall in love with literature all over again. Thank you Professor Pressman!!

Final Project Proposal

For my final project, I think I have finally decided on utilizing my second close reading essay and expanding on the themes and ideas of complicity that exist throughout the novel. My argument is going to revolve around the way in which Melville presents complicity through the characters and how he uses it in a way that is so representative of the complicity that resides within the American population.

At the moment, I think I am going to just be writing a 6 – 8 page essay, however, I really do want to do something creative so if inspiration hits me that might completely change.

Essay #2

Chapter 123 of the novel Moby Dick, titled The Musket, is a chapter about the character Starbuck and his internal battle over the morality of direct versus indirect action and him succumbing to his own complicity. Towards the end of the chapter, Melville writes the passage, “The yet levelled musket shook like a drunkard’s arm; Starbuck seemed wrestling with an angel; but turning from the door, he placed the death-tube in its rack and left the place.” This passage to me is one that exemplifies and concludes the entire internal and external battle that Starbuck had been having, not just in this chapter, but throughout the entire novel.

“The yet levelled musket shook like a drunkard’s arm”. This as the introduction to this passage about decision is extremely impactful because it shows a more external feeling within this chapter about an internal battle. The weapon shaking in his hands becomes an externalization of this internal crisis Starbuck has been having. The diction in this passage is so poignant and purposeful. Melville calling the musket “levelled” represents the fact that Starbuck still has yet to abandon the choice of killing Ahab completely. However, that is juxtaposed within the same sentence with the use of the simile of a “drunkard’s arm”. This simile suggests the ideas and feelings of disorientation and the body acting on its own accord. It also evokes a feeling of shame from the readers, making it seem as if Starbuck already feels the guilt of the action in which he is contemplating, before even doing it one way or another. This internal battle and the choice he makes is sort of the moment in which his extreme complicity begins. When he begins to tremble, he is demonstrating the inability to be decisive and make a choice that isn’t necessarily self serving. This truly is what leads to the demise of the voyage. 

“Starbuck seemed wrestling with an angel”. This section is a reference to the biblical story of Jacob wrestling an angel. This story is one that represents someone letting go of both their own self-reliance and their weakness and becoming one with God. I think this is such an interesting and impactful reference because it evokes an image within the readers of a sort of divine test for Starbuck. It shows Starbuck fighting with his own moral identity and weakness, the internal battle of remaining obedient and under control or starting a mutiny and being responsible, and the decision of which one is necessarily good or bad. The ‘angel’ that Starbuck is fighting is both his own personal conscience that is wanting him to stop Ahab, knowing that if they continue it will lead to their demise, and the moral and legal law when it comes to murder. This quote and this struggle truly dramatizes the moral question of what exactly is good and what exactly is bad. Is him directly killing Ahab worse than him indirectly killing everyone else by remaining complicit as Ahab leads the crew to their demise? Him fighting the angel represents him being unsure of what to do and this inability to choose is what in the end makes him remain complicit. His need to have a clean moral conscience and need to have something be right or wrong is what truly holds him back. The religious imagery that Melville utilizes is so impactful because it really represents to the readers how the moral correctness that Starbuck possesses itself becomes a fatal decision. 

“He placed the death-tube in its rack, and left the place.” The diction in this section is also so extremely impactful. By calling the musket a “death-tube” instead of just its name, it shifts the tone for the readers from the gun being just a practical tool to being a representation of morality and mortality. Starbuck choosing to place the gun back is a gesture of surrender but physically and morally. He willfully relinquishes his agency and this act is a physical representation of him giving into his obedience to Ahab. By placing the gun back, Starbuck knows both his and the rest of the crew’s fate and is both complicit and resigned to see it through. This is the exact moment where Starbuck’s complicit behavior becomes something that is concrete and unwavering. By returning the weapon and not committing the act of murder, he lands the final blow of giving the power back to Ahab completely. His decision shows that he is choosing the comfort of hierarchy and indirect action rather than the courage of making a change. The simplicity of the end of the quote saying “and left the place” really just demonstrates how resigned to his own fate he has become. By simply calling the room a “place” it leaves room for this to represent not only Starbuck leaving the room, but also leaving his own responsibility, morality, and sense of justice behind with the musket. Something that Melville makes very apparent to the readers with his characterization of Starbuck and the rest of the crew is that not being able to stop evil when you can is a direct action of participating in the evil. By choosing to walk away and not take action, Starbuck remains a complicit participant and essentially is the one who seals the fate of the Pequod.

Week 12 : Chapters 109 – 132

I really enjoyed reading this section of chapters. I think now that we are getting towards the end, the action and story are starting to ramp up so I am definitely gaining a newfound interest in the novel. Within this section, chapter 123 really stuck out to me. I think Starbuck is such a fascinating character and is honestly such a reflection of people in our society today.

The quote that I think stuck out to me the most was at the end of the chapter, “The yet levelled musket shook like a drunkard’s arm against the panel; Starbuck seemed wrestling with an angel; but turning from the door, he placed the death-tube in its rack and left the place.” Starbuck, since the beginning of this voyage, has been having a battle with both himself and Ahab and this battle truly comes to ahead in this chapter. In this chapter, Starbuck goes down to tell Ahab something and in the process finds the perfect opportunity to kill him and truly start a mutiny on the boat knowing that this journey, if not stopped, is going to lead to the demise of every single person on the boat. I think the internal battle Starbuck has in this chapter is just fascinating because of the true moral dilemma it presents. Murder is wrong, as Starbuck notes, but which is truly morally worse, killing one person or remaining complicit when you know that that person and their ambition will result in the deaths of so many more.

I think this is a true reflection of our society here in America. So many people hate the way in which the government is run and want it to change and know that if it continues to be run the way it is so many people’s lives will be ruined, but they refuse to do anything about it. It is written into our constitution that if the people deem the way in which the country is governed to be destructive, we hold the right to alter and abolish it. Yet, this is something that never happens because people hate discomfort more than they hate injustice. People may dislike the way in which the country is run, but they are comfortable with it and morally believe that somehow changing it could be worse than all of the lives that are being ruined at the present moment. I think this is so representative of the fight Starbuck is having. He knows making this change and taking control will be what saves them, but he doesn’t want that responsibility or that action on his conscious and he decides in the end to risk everyone else in exchange for his morals to remain somewhat intact.

Historically, complicity is what truly allows for things to go out of control and situations to escalate as much as they do and I think Melville putting themes of complicity and sitting back and watching when you know what is happening is wrong in the novel is so interesting because it truly shows just how common of a thing it is. Complicit behavior is not something that is singular or rare, it is something that is present everywhere and it being present on the Pequod is one of the most accurate depictions of society within the novel.

Week 11 : Chapters 91 – 108

As I am starting to get into the chunk of reading for this week, something stuck out to me pretty early on in the section. On the first page of chapter 92, Ambergris, Melville through the voice of Ishmael says “Who would think, then, that such fine ladies and gentlemen should regale themselves with an essence found in the inglorious bowels of a sick whale! Yet so it is.”

What I think really stuck out about this quote to me is how representative of the entire novel it is. So often, Melville and Ishmael remind the readers about how common whaling is at the time and how essential it was to the economy. Everything ran on whale power and this quote just emphasizes truly how common goods from the whales were in daily lives. The reminder of how, while whaling may seem unethical and gross to us now, that wasn’t always the case. People like us reading this novel were some of the main consumers of these goods that the whaling boats brought back and Melville really does try to bring to the forefront just how much of a commonality this was.

I think this also ties so much into the historical period in which this was written and how we look back upon it. We know that Melville is using the whale as a symbol and I think this quote and this constant reminder of how common something can be at one point and then be completely looked down upon could also represent the culture around slavery. We now of course know truly how awful slavery was even as an idea, but back then it was such a common thing. It can sometimes be hard to imagine these historical figures being proponents of these awful actions, but in reality this was what was common and known at the time. Just like how it’s hard for us to imagine people consuming products from whales. I think Melville does a brilliant job bringing the reader back to reality when reading this book, both through the historical aspect of it, but also through direct speech to the reader. Sometimes reading this book makes you feel like you are in a completely fictionalized world because of how outlandish it may seem to us now, but it is important for us to remember how truly real these situations were, both historical symbolism and true whaling descriptions alike.

Week 10 : Chapters 74 – 90

Something that has truly stuck out to me through reading both last week’s and this week’s section of the novel was the way in which Melville utilizes similes throughout his descriptions.

In chapter 85, The Fountain he is describing the way in which whales breath and regulate the amount of time they can stay above or below water. When describing the windpipe, he says “as his windpipe solely opens into the tube of his spouting canal, as as that long canal – like the grand Erie Canal – is furnished with a sort of locks (like open and shut) for the downward retention of air or the upward exclusion of water”. To me, this simile is perfect for demonstrating the impact the similes that Melville uses have on his writing. His writing is already extremely vivid with every single word he writes, but his use of simile takes it to another level, allowing for the text to be even richer with description through comparison. Especially when he is describing the whale or features of the whale, he is so vividly descriptive and a massive part of the description is the similes he utilizes. This one in particular allows us as readers to truly think about how large just one part of the whale may be through his use of comparing it to something extremely massive. It sort of puts it into perspective a bit for us, while still bringing the text and the story back to the country of America and the land over there. His use of simile allow for the text to remain both symbolic and vivid.

Week 9 : Chapters 43 – 57

As I begin to dive into this section of reading, something that keeps sticking out to me is the way in which Ishmael has started to speak about whales since joining the mission Ahab is on. In Chapter 45, The Affidavit, he is trying to express to the readers just how possible what is happening in their book is by discussing the habits and stories about sperm whales. But one quote that really stuck out to me was him saying “The man and the whale again came together, and the one vanquished the other.” (Melville, page 222) This quote does not exactly seem to truly have any significance to the overall message he is trying to present, but it really stuck with me.

I think the use of the word “vanquished” within this quote is so extremely impactful and shifts the way in which I feel the whale is being spoken about. It seems that since Ahab brought them all in on his mission of vengeance against Moby Dick, the whale is being spoken about in a more mythical sense, much like the way Ahab was spoken about prior to his introduction. it feels, to me, as if Melville is really trying to emphasize the true size and threat of the whale. Earlier in the book, he was really emphasizing just how massive sperm whales were to give the readers a perspective that they might not have, but now it seems like the power of the whale is what is being emphasized. This is effectively setting up the whale as such a looming presence on the ship despite it not having made an appearance yet.

I am not sure if this is the way it has been throughout the book and I am just now noticing, but I think regardless it is really impactful to the experience of reading.

Midterm Essay : Close Reading #1

Chapter 42, The Whiteness of the Whale, of Moby Dick is possibly the most important chapter in the entire novel. Melville’s writing throughout the book is so extremely intentional, yet the writing within this chapter is arguably the most purposeful and meaningful. Within this chapter, Ishmael speaks to the audience and tries to explain how his biggest fear when it comes to the titular whale is the whiteness of it. He ends his lamentation about the concept of whiteness with the quote “Or is it, that as an essence whiteness is not as much a color as the visible absence of color, and at the same time the concrete of all colors, is it for these reasons that there is such a dumb blankness, dull of meaning, in a wide landscape of snows – a colorless, all-color of atheism from which we shrink?” (Melville, page 212) Ishmael’s direct communication of his thoughts with the readers results in the readers themselves questioning what they may think they know about the world, allowing us to truly look at the whole journey within the story of Moby Dick from a broader, more real world perspective rather than it just being a fictional fantasy.

Breaking down this passage, the first part “Or is it, that as an essence whiteness is not as much a color as the visible absence of color, and at the same time the concrete of all colors” is a truly poignant and thought provoking sentiment. Ishmael presents the concept of whiteness in general as something that is unexplainable, that is incomprehensible. The color white on the surface seems to be just a complete void, something that contains nothing, not even color. Ishmael presents this as one of the main terrors of whiteness. He is provoking the readers to think about how something that is not a thing that exists, but rather is the complete lack of existence whatsoever is not something that should be worshiped or admired. He then adds on to that, immediately introducing the idea that at the same time, whiteness can also be the amalgamation of all color at once. This may seem like a counteraction, but it is intentional. He is presenting us with the fact that this concept of whiteness is something that is so devoid of any possible reasoning or explanation. He is purposefully being confusing because he is trying to emphasize just how terrifying this concept is when people blindly chase after it. There is a true terror in looking up to and worshiping something that is just incomprehensible.

The next section, “is it for these reasons that there is such a dumb blankness, dull of meaning, in a wide landscape of snows – a colorless, all-color of atheism from which we shrink?” Ishamel poses the question about how the inexplicable nature of the idea of whiteness could be the reason so much of what we see is simply devoid of any particular meaning. He impactfully includes the imagery of a “wide landscape of snows” to put in perspective to the readers how truly enormous this concept can be. The vision of  just a complete white out of snow just stretching forever really can put that terror into perspective. It truly shows just how vast and unknown that landscape is. The complete blindness that comes in that situation is what makes it terrifying, all you can see is the white of the snow, completely oblivious and ignorant to whatever else may be happening. This is extremely reflective in those who worship whiteness as a concept. They are so blinded by the color, or lack thereof, that they are rendered ignorant to anything else. Ishmael is utilizing this imagery to really emphasize to the readers just how the terror that exists with whiteness is because so often people associate it with the complete opposite. He compares this concept of whiteness to “a colorless, all-color of atheism”. This comparison may seem like just an off handed comment surrounded by more meaningful ones, but he uses it intentionally. Atheism is the lack of belief or faith in regards to religion or the existence of a god. Ishmael amounts these concepts to one another because the concept of whiteness, in which he argues, is essentially the same thing. A complete devoidness of the existence of anything. He is attempting to instill this understanding in the audience about how whiteness does not mean anything because it does not have any definitive purpose or explanation, just as atheism does not present itself with any definitive belief or faith. The concept of the color white is so often associated with faith and religion and purity, that by Ishmael providing it in the context of the complete opposite thing, atheism, he impactfully juxtaposes that association. He challenges the way in which we think. He also utilizes this comparison because of the fear it brings. He explicitly states within this section that when it comes to the idea and concept of atheism, it is something that everyone shrinks away from. Just the idea brings about an inherent fear to those who hold a faith. Faith and religion are things that are so important and essential to people’s lives and is also an essential concept within the novel. With introducing the concept of atheism by utilizing it as a vessel of comparison to the concept of whiteness, it puts this terror that Ishmael is trying to emphasize in a different context. One that a broader audience might understand. 

This passage is one of the most important in the entire novel. Ishmael presents to the readers a concept so devoid of meaning that it ends up being more meaningful than any other. He argues throughout this that truly nothing else matters if we cannot understand just how absurd it is to chase after and worship a concept that does not even exist itself. Melville, through the voice of Ishamel, is so intentional with every single word he writes. His use of comparison, imagery, and juxtaposition in this passage truly emphasizes the point he is trying to get across to the broadest audience possible. The white whale and Ishmael’s fear of it serves truly as a symbol for the audience and without this section, this symbol would not hold the same understanding or meaning.

Week 7 : Chapters 13 – 27

This weeks reading I found a bit more challenging than the readings prior and I think the main reason for that was the increase of dialogue between new characters. As Ishmael meets new characters and we are introduced to them, their conversations are relayed to us through dialouge, but the way in which they are written, I find a bit hard to read.

Despite that, the part of the reading that I found extremely interesting was essentially the entirety of Chapter 19 The Prophet and the character of Elijah. During his conversation with Ishmael, he says “Well, well, what’s signed, is signed; and what’s to be, will be; and then again, perhaps it won’t be, after all. ” This quote in particular really stuck with me because of how sort of prophetical, yet vague it is. Elijah acts as if he knows of what is to come in the future for the Pequod, yet at the same time we aren’t fully aware on if he actually does know something that they don’t or if he is just making a guess based on what he knows about the crew. Also throughout this chapter, we get more essentially ‘mythical’ descriptions and warnings about Captain Ahab through the vessel of Elijah. Something that I have really noticed that Herman Melville has done extremely well so far throughout this novel is build up suspense and intrigue for characters that we have yet to meet. If someone is going to be important to the story or to Ishmael later in the story, Melville will drag along their introduction, laying out intrigue through tales from other characters for both Ishmael and us the audience to truly wonder about. The use of a first person narrative through the mind of Ishmael really does help with this because we see him questioning and wondering about characters and in turn we begin to feel the same.

This chapter truly excited me to keep reading because of the intrigue it left of both meeting Captain Ahab and figuring out the fate of the crew of the Pequod. I am very interested to see if Elijah’s prophecies do come true for the crew. Something that was super interesting to me was the fact that religion has been such a massive aspect of the book so far and it is constantly brought up to the audience and to other characters, so the fact that Elijah has a biblical name makes me really wonder if his prophecies and predictions are actually rooted in more of a religious sign and warning for Ishmael and Queequeg rather than just a guess on his part.