Short Essay – Ishmael, Queequeg, and a Nation of Fear and Ignorance

In the book Moby Dick, author Herman Melville uses the development of human relations to critique American society as a whole, building off the inability to determine differences between races and ethnicities to create a nation that is incomplete in its understanding of one another. Throughout Moby Dick, the reader can see the tension or heartfelt companionship between different characters, most of their relations quite intriguing when compared to the time. Most notable is the relationship between the narrator, Ishmael – a white, middle-class, Presbyterian Christian – and Queequeg, a black, Pagan cannibal. Melville uses the evolution of Ishmael and Queequeg’s relationship to illustrate how curiosity and lack of fear of the unknown serve as a fundamental factor in personal growth and the bettering of the United States as a nation built on ignorance, showing how a willingness to understand what is unfamiliar to a person can transform ignorance and prejudice into mutual understanding and respect. 

Chapter four of the book is the most notable for the strange and rather rushed companionship between Ishmael and Queequeg, though it is not the focus of this essay.  The narrator’s lack of information regarding his new roommate at the Spouter Inn dissolves into a state of pure panic; who could this man be? A murderer? A savage? Of what race or occupation could he have been? With little information on who Queequeg actually was – even the lack of his name earlier in the book – Ishmael resorts to outbursts of fear and anger, demanding to know who he is to be roomed with. Upon reveal, his own prejudice in regards to black individuals and cannibals from never-before-seen islands of the South Pacific Ocean, Ishmael cannot help but be both terrorized and enraged. Though very subtle, concerning the time in which Moby Dick was written, the United States was divided based on race and slavery. The North and the South were at odds with what to do about runaway slaves, and whether the new states occupied through Westward Expansion were to be turned into free or slave states. Newbedford, Massachusetts, where Ishmael and Queequeg first met, was a free state, but with the consequences of the Fugitive Slave Act circulating at that time, tensions between white and black individuals were at an all-time high. With historical context, we can see where Ishmael’s fear stems from – from the unknown identity of his roommate, and later, the realization that Queequeg was an uncivilized, black cannibal. 

From this lack of understanding of who and what Queequeg actually was stemmed a guttural sense of curiosity within Ishmael. The simple nature of observing Queequeg and his actions – the way he walks, dresses, his tattoos, his Pagan idolatry towards Yojo (the small doll he carries with him and seemingly worships), and his speech – began to break down the barriers of ignorance that separated Ishmael and Queequeg into various categories. Queequeg states in Chapter thirteen, “It’s a mutual, joint-stock world, in all meridians. We cannibals must help these Christians” (pp. 68). The much-needed development of the United States, to Melville, should be built on a mutual understanding of one another, not the categorization and segregation of white from the “other”. To Queequeg, we all all human, and despite the initial introduction between him and Ishmael, the curiosity shown between the two of them has developed into a mutual understanding and respect for each other. Melville uses this development in their relationship to critique to ignorance of the United States, founded on the lack of understanding of what makes white superior to other races, and condemning our nation to a future of further ignorance as it grows into the idea of fear of the unknown. We fear what we lack knowledge of, whether it be the depths of the ocean or the idea that we are all the same, regardless of our race. 

What makes the quote above so intriguing within the book is that prior, Queequeg is overwhelmed with a “profound desire to learn among the Christians, the arts whereby to make his people happier” (62), only to learn that the glorious nation of the United States and its Christian citizens were in fact so backwards in their ways of thinking and understanding one another that they should instead learn from the cannibals. Ironic to think about: Christians learning from the ways of cannibals, a group demonized and referred to as uncivilized and dangerous, not only for their race, but for their culture. The lack of knowledge of Queequeg and his people instilled a fear towards them, one that makes Ishmael and his relationship so out of the ordinary to most. Their relationship is a direct reflection of what Melville hopes the United States to become: an accepting, knowledgeable nation built on the mutual respect and understanding of different peoples, not one that is separated based on race, and the idea that white is superior to all else. 

The latter idea alone can be torn from its pedestal under the singular quote that Queequeg believes white Christians should learn from the group they despise to return to a place of unity over division. Moby Dick, while encompassing numerous allegories and references to the foundation of our society and nation, focuses on how the lack of knowledge and understanding of oneself and others can form a rift from which we develop as a nation into an ignorant and fearful people. 




Ahab vs. Moby Dick

In Chapter 36, The Quarter-Deck, it is noticeable to the reader that Ahab is blindly seeking revenge against Moby Dick for the loss of his leg. I use the word “blindly” in a broad manner, not just referring to Ahab’s dismissal of danger and death of himself while seeking out Moby Dick, but also for that of his crew. As Ahad gathers the crew around in a sort of sacrificial toast, the text reads, “…the bloodshot eyes of the prairie wolves meet the eye of their leader, ere he rushes on their head in the trail of this bison; but alas! only to fall into the hidden snare of the Indian” (179)

Thinking realistically, wolves are keen and expert hunters, reflecting Ahab and the crew’s years of experience as whalers and harpooners. However, blinded by the bloodthirsty revenge to kill Moby Dick, Ahab is set to fall into the hands of the very thing he seeks out, or the inhabitants that live alongside them. While the rest of the crew blindly submits to Ahab’s orders to hunt down and kill Moby Dick, Starbuck is the only character who noticeably resists Ahab’s vengeful and problematic proposal. But, like the loyalty of a pack of wolves following their leader in a hunt, Starbuck submits to the will of his captain, allowing for the safety of himself and his crewmates to be jeopardized for the sake of bloodthirsty vengeance.

Ishmael and Religion

I would like to argue that Ishmael has become hypocritical in accepting religion as the book progresses. Ishmael states numerous times over, “I have no objection to any person’s religion…so long as that person does not kill or insult any other person, because that other person don’t believe it also” (94). With this, the reader would assume that as his and Queequeg’s relationship and bond progress over the course of the novel, Ishmael would become more accepting of the differences between his religion and others. But, directly following the quote above, Ishmael states, “But when a man’s religion becomes really frantic…makes this earth of ours an uncomfortable inn to lodge in; then I think it high time to take that individual aside and argue the point with him” (94).

All of this turmoil within Ishmael began because of Queequeg’s day of fasting – Ramadan. And because of Ishmael’s lack of understanding of how Queequeg goes about Ramadan (kneeling in silence for a day with no food), he chooses to argue with Queequeg and attempt to get him to stop (you could arguably call this a conversion of some sort, if not to Christianity, then away from his own religious practices). It is hypocritical to reiterate throughout the novel how we should remove certain prejudices from our ways of thinking, especially regarding different religions, and even more so concerning that Ishmael is letting his ignorance feed into his fear of losing Queequeg. One could argue that, based on ignorance and prejudice, the likelihood of losing Queequeg is even stronger by those means than by any other. The novel seemingly contradicts different comparable topics: comparing men as one thing alongside the complete opposite, or writing so that their speech does not reflect their internal monologue or thoughts.

I believe this to be hypocritical; while it could be seen as a reflection of Ishmael’s concern for Queequeg’s well-being, this moment in the novel directly reveals the boundaries between Ishmael’s radical openness towards different religious practices and the difference between mental/intellectual acceptance of these practices and Ishmael’s practical interaction with them.

Week 6: Queequeg and Ishmael

The change that occurs between Queequeg and Ishmael, as well as the further development of their friendship, is worthy of note. In the beginning chapters, Ishmael constantly repeats the narrative that ignorance is the parent of fear and that he has underlying prejudices against Queequeg because he is a cannibal. That being said, later in our reading, it is written that, “[Queequeg] seemed to take to me quite as naturally and unbiddenly as I to him; and when our smoke was over, he pressed his forehead against mine, clasped me round the waist, and said that henceforth we were married…that we were bosom friends; he would gladly die for me…” (57). To see such a shift in their dynamic after a mere two days in each other’s company is conflicting, given the apparent observation. Whether romantic or platonic, their dynamic mirrors the ever-shifting relationship that people have with the ocean.

The ocean is constantly changing, and while there are various descriptions throughout the novel that highlight the world’s fascination with the ocean and the fear that it holds towards the depths and its inhabitants, there is always something that ends up luring them out into its vastness. Ishmael’s quick change towards Queequeg is representative of the change in attitude towards the ocean and its dangers; yes, Queequeg is a cannibal, but after finding the time to pick him apart and get to know his peculiar habits and behavior, Ishmael has developed a strong connection and understanding of his friend, having been lured in by his peculiarities and affection. With understanding and patience comes a sense of stability and safety, one that can be found alongside Queequeg, as well as traversing the unknown expanses of the ocean.

Etymology and Extracts – Moby Dick

For this week’s reading, I understand all the warnings now about how Moby Dick is a difficult and boring read. I could not really grasp the entirety of what I was reading, but I am sure that as I continue on, I will better understand it.

From what I could gather from the readings, the way the Etymology sections starts off creates an important question as to the lack of inclusion on all matters of whaling and the ocean, and whether that assists in the lessening of the significance of either. Melville’s telling of whaling and exploring the sea, while not entirely non-fiction, but also not entirely fictional, may create a gap in the reader’s understanding of the extent of the dangerous and unintentionally frivolous travels of the ocean. The quote, “While you take in hand to school others, and to teach them by what name a whale-fish is to be called in our tongue, leaving out, through ignorance, the letter H, which almost alone maketh up the signification of the word, you deliver that which is not true” by Hackluyt announces the importance of the accomadations made towards important areas of information for the benefit of assisting our learning of it in our own language. While somewhat off topic, we can see this in translations of many other texts, for instance: The Grettis Saga, which has been translated into various different languages. In the beginning of each of these books there is a disclaimer made by the translators that the significance and the grammatical choices made in the origonal texts are often lost through translation, making the texts become modified and in theory, un-truthful in their translation of the original accounts.

Blog Response – “A Poetics of Planetary Water” by Steve Mentz

Steve Mentz constantly discusses the means of changing our relationship with the water in our environment. For centuries, the ocean and large bodies of water have been viewed as something to conquer, to possess, and something that can be transformed into a border or a place of recreation. This type of mindset revolves around issues of colonization, laying claim to or being placed in a position above something that cannot be “owned”. Melville refers to this as the “masterless ocean”, as Mentz references in his writing, something that humans “depend upon [it] and love [it], but it cannot be our home” (p. 4). It seems pointless to lay claim to something that is ever-changing and thus cannot be tamed. The ocean is something almost alien, especially considering that we know so little about it. To lay claim to the very thing that we cannot defeat or confine shows our complete lack of understanding of what the ocean truly stands for. Mentz urges us through the study of blue humanities to learn more about the ocean because “we are going to be seeing more of it, closer up, in the future” (p. 8) Not only in the rising sea levels of the unexplored ocean, but in the heavier rainstorms that risk flooding our neighborhoods with the ever-growing draught of our planet, we risk succumbing to the extremes of the water that we consider having rights over. The very thing we own, without proper knowledge or understanding of, will ultimately kill us all.

What “Moby-Dick” Means to Me – Week 3 Response

For this week’s reading, I will be responding to “What ‘Moby-Dick’ Means to Me” by Phillip Hoare. I chose this reading specifically because, as a lot of us have mentioned, we either take little or renowned interest in Moby Dick, or have struggled to read it in the past. Despite this, we have all ended up in this class together, determined to get through the novel and understand it from a new perspective. In Hoare’s article, he refers to Moby Dick as “not a novel…barely a book at all.” I found this interesting, given that there are several definitions of what a “book” could be. Oftentimes, a book does not need to meet literary guidelines; it could be made up of the most sappy, stomach-flipping, agitating nonsense and still be cleared off the shelves. I compared Hoare’s first opinion of Moby Dick to those in our class; he claims the novel “defeated” him the first time around, and I feel as though our read through of the novel might result in the same for many of us.

Even so, the uniqueness of the novel is what inspires us, like Hoare, to come back and read it once more. Whether we are in it for the facts (real or imagined by Melville) about whaling, the homoerotic relationships created throughout the novel, the dangers of sailing the open sea, cannibalism, or much, much more, Moby Dick is only what we make it out to be. I believe this is why so many people fall short of enjoying or understanding the novel their first time around. Might it be from a lack of comprehension of what Melville discusses, or the boring length of the book and the chapters that draw on endlessly, if the reader is not picking up on certain parts of the novel and the individual uniqueness of each part, and how they all tie in together, then they are ultimately losing the whole purpose of reading the novel. No wonder it took Phillip Hoare practically 30 years to finally enjoy Moby Dick!

Entry on Gilbert King’s Excerpt

Between Emmerson and King’s excerpts, Gilbert King’s seemed the most interesting to me. I have always been more drawn to the horrific side of history that which some of our society’s literature is based on. Seeing as I am coming into this class having NOT read Moby Dick prior, the mention of cannibalism drew me in.

Being based on the sunken ship Essex, Herman Melville took the tragedy as an opportunity to write about the horrors of the whaling industry. Given King’s approach, both literal and hypothetical, it is difficult to imagine how a person’s mind and body would react given such circumstances. Melville’s book goes in depth about the darker side of human nature, and while King referred to a particular figure within the literature as a “thing,” I could not help but produce multiple instances to which said “thing” could be applied. The “thing” could be the whale, the ship, the sea, or man themselves, but considering a darker, more metaphysical approach, I would like to consider that he is talking about human nature. Human nature as we know it ranges through a wide variety of behavior, but being pushed to the limits as the ship’s crew is in Moby Dick, the “thing” that King talks of could very well the human nature pushed to its limits. Starved, scared, and desperate, the surviving men turn to cannibalism to stay alive. While skimming other’s posts, I could tell that some thought the same thing as I did; given a hypothetical question, we would never turn to it, but in reality, there is no saying what we would do to survive, or the “thing” that we would become to do so.

Introduction :3

Hi, my name is Rayne Lambert. I am excited to take this class to reignite my love of reading. As an English major, I find it important to continue reading different pieces of literature that I have little to no engagement with, as well as broaden the range of literature that I consume to better my own writing. Hopefully, this class can help me achieve that! I am excited to get to know the rest of you this semester. If any of you are still interested in my icebreaker regarding animal rehabilitation and living on a wildlife sanctuary growing up, I am happy to answer any questions or tell you any stories 🙂