Yousuf Shwiha

Moby-Dick

Pro. Jessica Pressman

November 30, 2025

 Money, Power, and the Moral Economy of Whaling and Slavery in Moby-Dick

In Chapter 99 of Moby-Dick, titled “The Doubloon,” Herman Melville transforms a single gold coin into a world of meanings. Ahab nails a Spanish doubloon to the mast and promises it as a reward to whoever first spots the white whale. The coin becomes more than a mere incentive: it becomes a mirror in which every sailor sees his own desires, fears, and moral limitations. Melville’s description of the coin, “The firm tower, that is Ahab; the volcano, that is Ahab; the courageous, the undaunted, and victorious fowl, that, too, is Ahab; all are Ahab; and this round gold is but the image of the rounder globe, which, like a magician’s glass, to each and every man in turn but mirrors back his own mysterious self” (Melville 465).  Ahab’s obsession links the whaling voyage to the economic and moral foundations of nineteenth-century capitalism, an era when wealth was generated through both whaling and slavery. The image of the “round gold” that mirrors the “rounder globe” encapsulates Melville’s critique of a global system driven by profit and pride. Money, symbolized by the doubloon, connects the Pequod’s hunt for whales to the wider history of empire, labor, and exploitation. In this essay, I will argue that “The Doubloon” exposes the moral blindness of capitalism by revealing how both whaling and slavery rely on the same logic of commodification. Through close reading of Melville’s imagery of gold, reflection, and pride, I will show how Ahab’s coin becomes a microcosm of the global market—one that turns both human beings and nature into instruments of profit. The “round gold” nailed to the Pequod’s mast is not just a piece of metal; it is a symbolic world. Melville’s repetition of the word round, “round gold,” “rounder globe”, underscores how economic circulation mirrors the motion of the world itself. Gold, like the Earth, moves in cycles: mined from one continent, traded through another, and melted down into new forms. In Melville’s time, Spanish doubloons were colonial artifacts, minted from gold extracted by enslaved or coerced labor in the Americas. Thus, the coin aboard the Pequod carries a hidden history of human suffering. When Melville writes that the coin is “but the image of the rounder globe,” he reveals how money condenses global relations into a single, glittering surface. The image conceals the reality of labor that produced it. Similarly, the whaling industry relied on invisible chains of exploitation, sailors from colonized nations, racial hierarchies aboard ships, and dangerous labor that enriched merchants far from the sea. As Charles Olson notes in Call Me Ishmael, “The sea-trade was America’s first factory,” a system where “the whale was a slave” and the sailor only slightly freer (Olson 47). What I want to connect here is that the money used for buying whales is very similar to the money that was used for buying the slaves, and comparing whales with slaves in one hand with the value of money in the other hand, it looks like that money is very important to buy anything even the conscious of others. For example, voting in the election which is happening now a days in most democratic countries; they consider themselves they are following democratic order. The doubloon’s circularity thus symbolizes the moral economy of the nineteenth century: a closed system of extraction and consumption. Melville’s description that the coin “mirrors back” each man’s self implies that capitalism depends on projection—each participant sees personal meaning in what is, in truth, a collective delusion. Just as Ahab sees his pride reflected in the coin, so did slaveholders and merchants see divine justification in their wealth. Melville’s image of the “magician’s glass” exposes this illusion. The coin enchants those who gaze upon it, masking the suffering that sustains its gleam.

To understand why Melville invests so much meaning in a gold coin, it is essential to consider the world economy in which Moby-Dick was written. Published in 1851, Moby-Dick emerged during a period when both the whaling industry and slavery were central to American prosperity. Whale oil illuminated cities, lubricated machines, and symbolized progress. Yet behind this industry was a system of brutal labor conditions, racialized hierarchies, and ecological violence. The same society that celebrated industrial innovation also justified the enslavement of millions. The whaling ship and the slave plantation may appear to belong to different worlds—one hunting animals in the open ocean, the other exploiting human beings on land—but both shared a moral foundation: the belief that the natural world and the human body were resources to be owned, measured, and sold. Melville subtly connects these two economies through imagery of gold and labor. When he writes that “Great pains, small gains for those who ask the world to solve them,” he speaks to the human cost of both whaling and slavery. The phrase “great pains” recalls the toil of sailors who risk death for profit, as well as the suffering of enslaved people whose pain was literally converted into wealth. The “small gains” echo the reality that even those who profited—captains, shipowners, plantation masters—were spiritually impoverished. Toni Morrison, in Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination, argues that white American literature often relies on a “shadowed African presence” that remains unacknowledged but essential (Morrison 33). Melville’s doubloon operates in precisely this way: it gleams because it hides the dark histories of exploitation that produced it. The “rounder globe” is not an innocent sphere but one mapped by slavery, conquest, and trade. Melville’s passage therefore turns the Pequod into a floating miniature of the world economy ship whose cargo is ideological as much as oil. Ahab’s identification with the coin, “the firm tower, that is Ahab; the volcano, that is Ahab; … all are Ahab”, reveals how personal ambition fuses with the capitalist pursuit of profit. The coin does not merely promise wealth; it symbolizes power, pride, and conquest. Ahab’s ego becomes indistinguishable from his economic motive. Like a slaveholder or merchant, he sees himself as a master of the world, destined to bend nature to his will. The phrase “as proud as Lucifer” connects economic pride to spiritual rebellion. Lucifer’s sin was not poverty but ambition—desiring godlike control. Ahab’s fixation on Moby Dick mirrors this same sin. Both whaling and slavery spring from the same arrogance: the belief that one being has the right to dominate another. The gold coin, glittering in the sun, is thus a secular idol—a false god that commands sacrifice. Gregory S. Jay, in “Melville’s Economy of Pain,” observes that Melville “treats profit as the residue of pain converted into abstract value” (Jay 112). This insight helps illuminate the line “Great pains, small gains.” Every drop of whale oil, every ounce of gold, every pound of cotton represents transformed suffering. Melville’s poetic inversion—pains producing gains—captures how capitalism converts life into commodity. The mirror imagery also speaks to moral blindness. When Melville writes that the coin “mirrors back his own mysterious self,” he implies that each man’s interpretation of the doubloon reveals his character. Starbuck, Stubb, and Flask each read the coin differently—one sees divine providence, another luck, another appetite. This diversity of readings underscores that money has no inherent meaning; it reflects the moral state of its beholder. In Ahab’s case, the reflection is monstrous. His obsession with the coin—and the whale it represents—shows how greed becomes a form of possession.

However, The Pequod is a microcosm of the nineteenth-century world order. Its diverse crew, Black, Indigenous, Asian, and white sailors, represents a miniature empire driven by a single goal: profit. The ship’s name itself, “Pequod,” recalls the exterminated Pequot tribe, reminding readers that America’s economic expansion rests on conquest. The gold coin nailed to its mast becomes a flag of empire. The roundness of the coin mirrors the roundness of the Earth, suggesting that global capitalism is circular: it consumes endlessly but never reaches fulfillment. Melville’s use of the phrase “magician’s glass” suggests illusion and self-deception. The sailors are enchanted by the coin just as nations are enchanted by gold. The doubloon’s shine blinds them to its history—it was likely minted from colonial plunder, its gold dug by enslaved or indebted workers in South America. Christopher Benfey’s the American Adam provides a useful framework for reading Ahab as an archetypal figure of American ambition. Benney describes Melville’s heroes as “self-made men who seek to master the world through solitary will” (Beeney 89). Yet Melville exposes the violence beneath this myth. Ahab’s mastery leads not to creation but to destruction. His pursuit of the whale—driven by a coin—parallels the nation’s pursuit of expansion through slavery and industry. The Pequod’s final wreck symbolizes the inevitable collapse of a system built on domination. In both whaling and slavery, value is extracted from bodies—animal or humans without regard for their suffering. Melville’s description of “great pains, small gains” can be read as a moral equation. The “pains” are physical and spiritual; the “gains” are material and fleeting. Melville thus inverts the capitalist promise of endless growth. His language anticipates Marx’s critique that labor under capitalism becomes alienated—that the worker’s pain enriches someone else. The line “Great pains, small gains for those who ask the world to solve them” also reveals a profound theological dimension. The phrase “ask the world to solve them” suggests that those who look to material wealth for meaning will be disappointed. The world offers no solution because it is itself corrupted by greed. In this sense, the coin is not only an economic symbol but a spiritual test. Each man’s reflection in the coin reveals whether he sees the divine or the demonic in gold. Melville’s genius lies in how he fuses these levels, economic, psychological, and spiritual, into a single image. The doubloon is both a literal coin and a mirror of civilization’s soul. Its roundness suggests perfection, yet it is also a closed loop of desire. The same circular motion that drives the Earth also traps humanity in cycles of exploitation. Melville’s “round gold” thus becomes a prophetic warning: the world’s wealth is also its curse. VI. The “Magician’s Glass”: Seeing and Refusing to See The most haunting phrase in the passage— “like a magician’s glass, to each and every man in turn but mirrors back his own mysterious self”—invites reflection on perception itself. The mirror both reveals and deceives. A magician’s glass, after all, is a tool of illusion: it shows what the viewer wants to see. Melville anticipates modern critiques of ideology—how social systems make people complicit in their own domination. “It so chanced that the doubloon of the Pequod was a most wealthy example of these things. On its round border it bore the letters, REPUBLICA DEL ECUADOR: QUITO. So, this bright coin came from a country planted in the middle of the world” P.471). In The Doubloon, each sailor interprets the coin differently, but none question the system that gives it power. Similarly, in the nineteenth century, few questioned the moral legitimacy of industries like whaling or slavery. Both were seen as natural facts of progress. The coin’s surface, smooth, bright, and beautiful, conceals the rough reality of the world it represents. Melville’s use of reflective imagery throughout Moby-Dick—the sea as mirror, the whale’s head as mirror, now the coin as mirror—suggests that self-knowledge is inseparable from confronting moral complicity. To see oneself truly, one must look beyond the surface of gold. But as Melville implies, most men cannot bear that sight. They prefer the comfort of illusion—the “magician’s glass” that flatters their pride. Melville’s meditation on the doubloon extends far beyond the whaling ship. His insight into how money mirrors the human soul remains urgently relevant in a world still driven by profit at the expense of life. The same logic that turned whales into barrels of oil and people into property persists in modern economies that treat labor and nature as disposable. When Melville writes, “Great pains, small gains for those who ask the world to solve them,” he anticipates our own disillusionment with material wealth. The pursuit of profit, like Ahab’s pursuit of Moby Dick, promises fulfillment but delivers ruin. The Pequod’s destruction becomes an allegory for the self-destructive tendencies of capitalist civilization. Toni Morrison’s reminder that American literature is haunted by the legacy of slavery helps us read Moby-Dick as a text that struggles with its own complicity. The gold coin, after all, is both a literal reward and a symbolic burden—it shines with the light of stolen labor. By linking the hunt for whales to the buying and selling of humans, Melville reveals how deeply capitalism corrupts moral vision. The power of The Doubloon lies in its prophetic universality. Melville suggests that “all are Ahab”—that each person participates, knowingly or not, in systems of domination. The coin’s mirror reflects not only Ahab’s pride but the reader’s own. We, too, live in a world where gold—now digital, abstract, global—continues to dictate value. Melville’s warning remains clear: to worship gold is to risk losing one’s soul.

As to conclude, “The Doubloon,” Melville compresses the entire moral and economic history of the nineteenth century into a single image of gold. The coin represents the world’s wealth, its violence, and its blindness. Through the language of reflection— “round gold,” “rounder globe,” “magician’s glass”—Melville exposes how capitalism turns both human and natural life into profit while concealing its own cruelty behind beauty. By connecting the whaling voyage to the slave economy, Melville reveals that these two systems share a common origin in pride and greed. The Pequod’s doomed pursuit of the whale mirrors America’s pursuit of empire—relentless, self-destructive, and morally bankrupt. The line “Great pains, small gains for those who ask the world to solve them” stands as a moral epitaph for modern civilization. It warns that a world obsessed with gold will ultimately be consumed by its own reflection. In the end, Melville’s vision remains both tragic and redemptive. The gold coin, though corrupt, forces self-recognition. To look into the “magician’s glass” is to confront the truth that we, too, are Ahab—participants in cycles of desire and exploitation. Only by acknowledging this reflection can humanity hope to break the circle of “round gold” and rediscover value beyond price.

Works Cited

Benfey, Christopher. The American Adam: Essays on Melville, Emerson, and Hawthorne. University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Jay, Gregory S. “Melville’s Economy of Pain.” American Literature, vol. 61, no. 1, 1989, pp. 109–128.

Melville, Herman. Moby-Dick; or The Whale. 1851. Edited by Hershel Parker, Norton Critical Edition, W. W. Norton, 2018.

Morrison, Toni. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Harvard University Press, 1992.

Olson, Charles. Call Me Ishmael. City Lights Books, 1947.

final paper idea

I am using the Tower of Babel to make connections with Moby Dick. I am still gathering the sections that support the claim that Moby Dick and the Tower of Babel are making similar moral lessons about unity and doom. I’m still not sure exactly what the claim is, but I do have the asynchronous peer review’s submission as a guide. It has something to do with Ahab and everyone else on the Pequod.

I was planning to make a creative project, but I don’t have the tools to put the effort I wish I could into it, so I’ll probably just do a formal essay.

I do wonder if I can reference the Bible despite not being a reading for the course. My only reference anyways is Genesis 11:1-9, while in Moby Dick, I have to look at Chapter 36 and Chapter 135. I’d appreciate some pointers and other chapters that may help, though these two are the most explicit I can grab from my notes.

final thesis idea

Reading the text vs reading the messages that hide behind the lines of the text, Melville takes us through a story. As he takes us through his story, he stops us in our tracks and makes us look at figures, paintings, and markings. This is how Melville teaches us how to read within reading. These painting and figures he asks us to read teaches us how to read his book, Moby Dick. We have to look further into these markings and paintings that Melville tells us to stop and read, just as we do with text. It’s about stopping, taking a first glance, reading the marking, leaving, and coming back to re-read the same markings. Throughout the whole book, we encounter paintings, figures, and markings, such as the painting in the Spouter Inn, the right whale’s head, the sperm whale’s head, and Queequeg’s tattoos. This book is filled with nuance and long, wordy paragraphs, but then we come across something like the painting at the beginning of the book; he tells us to stop and look with Ishmael. It’s the message within the painting that gives us some answers to the nuance. The art of the lesson that Melville is teaching us is a demonstration of closing reading, to adventure beyond the text and find out why he asks us to look at the right whale’s head and why the details give us (the audience) answers to the nuance that Melville is writing.

With this thesis, I want to close read certain objects, paintings, and figures.

Starting with the painting at the beginning of the book, The Spouter Inn, then the Right Whale’s head, then Queegueg’s tattoos in relation to his coffin, and then I want to close read the markings, such as the marble tables in the chapel. I will discuss why it’s important for us to closely read these non-textual elements within the text and how they teach us to read Moby Dick.

Final Project Proposal

For my final essay/project, I am going to discuss the issues of coerced obedience and vain unity within Moby Dick. I have not fully collected all of the chapters/sections I will be pulling from, but I know I will be using Ahab’s monomaniacal leadership and the idea of the Pequod as a “nation-state” as part of my evidence. Using these important themes throughout the novel, I intend to tie Melville’s underlying themes about the eroding democracy of the United States and the rise of extremist, centralized thinking within the states that leads to a greater division amongst the North and the South (and Africans and Europeans).

I am still deciding whether or not I just want to write a formal essay about my proposal or if I should bother with a creative piece to tie into it. I tend to take too much time on the creative aspects of a project rather than the writing itself, but I think a creative piece will really tie into my argument how the novel comes across to the reader, especially a reader of color who was both directly and indirectly affected by the horrendous acts of the United States during the late 19th century and somewhat (because this is a close reading and we are not focused on the now) how some of the themes are very applicable in current day.

A blog for week fourteen about my final project (Doubloon)

” Melville’s description that the coin “mirrors back” each man’s self implies that capitalism depends on projection—each participant sees personal meaning in what is, in truth, a collective delusion” (Moby-Dick).

For my final project on Doubloon, I still need to deepen my understanding of how its in-game economy evolves over time. I want to learn more about the factors that cause Doubloon value to rise or fall so I can better explain its trends. I also need to refine my data visualization to make the project clearer and more engaging. Another task is improving my analysis by comparing Doubloon to similar virtual currencies. Finally, I must review my conclusions to ensure they clearly connect back to the project’s main questions.

Final Project Brainstorm

What you still need to learn/do for your final project

Honestly, I am not entirely sure what I want to focus on for my final project. But to throw an idea out there, I will be doing a close reading expanding more on obsession and the negative effects it has on a person while specifically focusing on Ahab. I still need to do the research though and figure out what examples I want to use. I would still like to explore other ideas for the final though. And, something I still need to learn is close reading and explaining myself more. Close reading has never been my strong suit and I still have a lot to learn.

Week 13: What’s next….

What do you need to do/learn for your final project?

I feel like I still need to learn more and understand a bit more about close reading certain things. I’ve been to overwhelmed with the class and by all the information that I have zero idea on what I’m going to do. I’m not much of a creative artsy type of person, so I’m just bee doing an essay. For my final project, I will be discussing about mental health, alcoholism, obsession and more into the mental health part of the chapters, I’ll mostly be focusing on Ahab, Pip and Ishmael depending on how it goes and the subject. Close reading has become such an experience to do in my life and still need practice on it too. I still need to do research and find some examples from the chapters of the book and see where this goes.

Or The Whale.

There’s much to be done before the final, researching and planning for the massive essay, one that honours the novel and perhaps even makes a reader rethink and recontextualise the novel’s events! Or so I hope. The bit that has me in its grips, that just continues to swim about my mind fluid, is how the titular Whale is not this evil creature filled with hate—no, of course not, that would be Ahab—but rather this being filled with kindness. Could it be that this creature is one of kindness, as seen with the warnings that are given before they engage with the Whale at the end of the novel? Might this creature be biblical in that from the first sin came hate and violence (Ahab)? I am completely unable to get the idea out of my head that perhaps, just maybe, the Whale can be seen as a messenger from God, much like an archangel or have a similar use in the novel as Adam does in the bible? How much of the Whale do we see reflected in the sermon whale? And the other way about? I find this Whale endlessly fascinating and I am beyond excited to work this into an actual idea worth presenting!

Final Project Thoughts

What do you still need to learn/do for your final project?
Melville’s use of circles, physical and metaphorical, in Moby Dick has caught my attention and I will explore that concept for my final project. I have interpreted this shape to be Melville’s discussion of infinity and Eternity, and endless cycles that make up life. For my project, I would like to dive deeper into this concept and find out what is the bigger purpose of it in the narrative and what does it tell us about the overall message of the book. What does Eternity represent for Melville? Should we as readers find the idea comforting, terrifying, or both? Is the point to be nihilistic or optimistic? All important questions for me to consider. In my case, I need to scan the book to find examples of this concept and contrast them with each other on how they are being used and for what. Compiling excerpts will give me a better idea of the kind of argument they make and the argument I will be making. I also need to do more research for the reference part of our project, so I am excited to dive back into our reading list and beyond and let my project take shape from there. Finally, once I have my argument (or while forming it) I’ll decide if it suits me better to do a long essay or choose a creative medium with a short essay. Both ideas sound doable for what I will be talking about, but I’ll give myself more time to decide the medium.

wk 14: A work in progress…

I want to extend my discussion of fossils, and the fossil whale, or the whale as an artifact and history, through an essay. To do this I wanted to incorporate other mentions of the whale as an archeological site, besides my original focus on ch104: The fossil whale. I want to emphasize the conversations on history that are had in this book, which requires some deep diving and recalling throughout the scope of this book. The reason I wanted to focus on this topic is because,, as a lover of history, I was drawn to the deconstruction of what counts as history, what gets told and what gets tossed under the rug of time. 

Thesis under construction: Ishmael discusses the validity of the ‘american’ historical canon through the body of the whale, or “the fossil whale”. Whales have a deeper connection to the scope of American history as a continent, especially to the original hunters before colonization (the spear found in a whale). As a fossil, the whale is borderless, traversing the watery world, and leaving it’s print among the land, part of a momentary recession of the waterline. The whale, in this sense, dismantles the American canon of permanence and ownership over a continent during an age of border expansion.

This is a very early version of my thesis, as you can see, I’m still very caught between the fossil v history, and the fossil v borders/maps.