Propaganda? Tangent Time!

Reading the article “Melville Reborn, Again and Again,” nothing particularly stood out to me. I read the entire piece, reflected on the points that Wills made, and then moved on. However, the end made me curious:

“…O.W. Riegel (1903-1997) was renowned as an expert on propaganda who amassed a world-class collection of propaganda posters over his long life.”

Why was a renowned expert on propaganda focused on Moby Dick? Was there any aspect of the novel that leaned into propaganda or served as a vessel in some way?

The novel was written as a response to Emerson’s call for American national identity. Melville writes, in significant detail, about the dying art of the whaling industry. It is through Melville’s work that the American whaling industry and its success are encapsulated in time and can be meticulously recreated through his meticulous detailing. While propaganda experts obviously have other interests and topics they focus on, this made me wonder about the connections between Melville’s depiction of American identity and propaganda. As members of this course and students who closely read every single critique and subtle sociopolitical commentary, we understand the many radical positions that Melville took throughout the 624 pages of Moby Dick, but to others, who take this novel at face value or entirely miss the not-so-subtle jabs at the American political system, could the novel be taken as American propaganda?

Personally, I started by saying, “No way, it is not American propaganda,” but then I thought about it a little more. The Pequod represents American identity, with a strict hierarchy of order and authority. While one could argue that the hierarchy of the Pequod represents a democracy focused on diversity, propaganda doesn’t have to be accurate in any sense. Still, it does have to portray the primary focus in a positive light. This is a fantasy realm that stars a fake sense of American unity, both politically and socially. Additionally, Ahab’s complex character could portray the ideal American identity, one that prioritizes individuality and ambition over reason, almost a romanticization of transcendence and vision. He’s mythocal, he’s so unbelievable and mysterious that he seems made up, yet he exists entirely as himself.

Even after these reflections, I was still doubtful that it could function as American propaganda until I considered what propaganda truly is. Propaganda doesn’t have to end with a win for the intended country, but it’s based on the myth of the cultural ideals and suggestions. Moby Dick could be argued to be a piece of cultural propaganda just as much as someone could say that it isn’t. While I was initially quick to shut the idea down, the more I think about it, the more it grows.

2 thoughts on “Propaganda? Tangent Time!

  1. Hi Alyssa,

    I also noticed that anecdote at the end and was surprised by it. You could even argue that Moby-Dick is a Counterpropaganda, a form of communication consisting of methods taken to oppose propaganda which seeks to influence perspectives, on the American Identity. This aligns with the notion that most of the “American ideals” present in the book are either disregarded or facetious – even the idea of rights to own slaves is taken to task in this novel about a man on a whaling ship. From that prospective, I think this would prove to be incredibly interesting and valuable to look into as an expert in propaganda. We could consider this an alternative take on his interest.

    Thanks for the interesting read!

    -Kit Jackson

  2. Hi Alyssa,
    I think this is a really interesting way to think about propaganda. I really like these comparisons you made of the boat representing a false sense of unity and Ahab representing the ideal independent american. Even though there were these small tiffs here and there on the boat, everyone seemed to get along well… or at least if there were more disagreements they weren’t highlighted. and even the disagreements found with Ahab were shoved down, with Ahab staying in power, representing this idealized idea of the US where despite being presented as a democracy, there is an executive that retains power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *