Final Takeaway

This class was challenging and rewarding, a bit of a wild ride. I think my biggest takeaway from it would have to be the importance of doing stuff imperfectly. This challenging book we read was a lot, but it helped me develop the discipline to stick with it despite not reading every single word or line. I normally refuse to say I’ve read a book until I’ve read every single page until the end (for this reason, a lot of times I end up leaving books for school unfinished, because I feel like I have failed to read them perfectly), but this has shown me that this is not necessarily true. Close reading this, though not every single line, was one of the most valuable and enriching reading experiences I’ve had, at least in a long time. The process to learn close reading was a gradual one too, and it forced me to make failed attempts many times until I hit the mark. However, the opportunities to revise and correct our work were a very important step in this learning process. I tend to shy away from doing things unless I absolutely know exactly what to do, but this class has helped me realize my work is not of less value if it’s not perfect, it just means I’m human and I’m learning.

In terms of the content of the book itself, I feel like I’ve gained a new perspective of America as a country and us as a people. As a Mexican-American, I tend to separate my two nationalities with that hyphen: I am both, but they are distinct from one another. The discussion of what makes an American an American has caused me to question if this separation is really necessary. I am newly interested in what it means to be a person of the United States and why, what American culture might be, and what that means for our society. I’ve always thought that the strength of this nation lies in the combination of so many backgrounds and contributions that enrich us. I still believe this and the book has challenged me to think more deeply on this and how that relates to the American identity.

Propaganda? Tangent Time!

Reading the article “Melville Reborn, Again and Again,” nothing particularly stood out to me. I read the entire piece, reflected on the points that Wills made, and then moved on. However, the end made me curious:

“…O.W. Riegel (1903-1997) was renowned as an expert on propaganda who amassed a world-class collection of propaganda posters over his long life.”

Why was a renowned expert on propaganda focused on Moby Dick? Was there any aspect of the novel that leaned into propaganda or served as a vessel in some way?

The novel was written as a response to Emerson’s call for American national identity. Melville writes, in significant detail, about the dying art of the whaling industry. It is through Melville’s work that the American whaling industry and its success are encapsulated in time and can be meticulously recreated through his meticulous detailing. While propaganda experts obviously have other interests and topics they focus on, this made me wonder about the connections between Melville’s depiction of American identity and propaganda. As members of this course and students who closely read every single critique and subtle sociopolitical commentary, we understand the many radical positions that Melville took throughout the 624 pages of Moby Dick, but to others, who take this novel at face value or entirely miss the not-so-subtle jabs at the American political system, could the novel be taken as American propaganda?

Personally, I started by saying, “No way, it is not American propaganda,” but then I thought about it a little more. The Pequod represents American identity, with a strict hierarchy of order and authority. While one could argue that the hierarchy of the Pequod represents a democracy focused on diversity, propaganda doesn’t have to be accurate in any sense. Still, it does have to portray the primary focus in a positive light. This is a fantasy realm that stars a fake sense of American unity, both politically and socially. Additionally, Ahab’s complex character could portray the ideal American identity, one that prioritizes individuality and ambition over reason, almost a romanticization of transcendence and vision. He’s mythocal, he’s so unbelievable and mysterious that he seems made up, yet he exists entirely as himself.

Even after these reflections, I was still doubtful that it could function as American propaganda until I considered what propaganda truly is. Propaganda doesn’t have to end with a win for the intended country, but it’s based on the myth of the cultural ideals and suggestions. Moby Dick could be argued to be a piece of cultural propaganda just as much as someone could say that it isn’t. While I was initially quick to shut the idea down, the more I think about it, the more it grows.