Essay 1: Authority, Self-Awareness, and Obsession

In the 19th century, authority at sea was absolute. The captains had the say in everything, and this unchecked power was a matter of life or death. Being able to lead means understanding your people’s capabilities, and in a whaling ship, the boat’s life are the shipmates, like organs in a body. As the brain, Ahab from Moby-Dick knows this, but instead, he uses his position to satisfy his vengeance and obsession. When Starbuck questioned Ahab’s pursuit, Ahab saw it as a motivation. He calls himself “demoniac” and “madness maddened,” revealing his self-awareness as part of his insanity rather than a barrier. Ahab turns his madness into justification for his actions as captain.

Ahab’s self-awareness enables his rationality to make obsessive decisions, turning his authority as captain into an outlet for vengeance. In chapter 37, Sunset, Ahab was sitting alone in his cabin, staring out the windows, when he pondered, “They think me mad—Starbuck does; but I’m demoniac, I am madness maddened! That wild madness that’s only calm to comprehend itself!” (Melville, p. 183). The sentence “They think me mad—Starbuck does…” shows Ahab acknowledging how people see his craziness, but instead of denying it, he redefines it. By saying, “I’m demoniac, I am madness maddened!” he is claiming a higher, almost supernatural-like, form of madness. Melville’s choice of using repetition and the word “demoniac” shows how Ahab consciously justifies his abuse of authority with madness. He portrays how someone under emotional obsession can be dangerous regardless of clarity. In the phrase, ”That wild madness that’s only calm to comprehend itself,” that calmness is not sanity but a moment of control inside insanity. Ahab acknowledges the chaos he controls rather than resists. He understands he became the embodiment of absurdity, insanity, vengeance, and obsession, and he lets it all define him. Such madness isn’t blinding Ahab; it sharpens his vision. He clearly sees what he’s doing and he still chooses destruction.

What does that have to do with life or death? Simple: if madness himself is the brain, the rest of the body is obliged to follow it. You are reading this essay because you want to understand my insight, and just now you may have been wondering what authority, obsession, and self-awareness have to do with anything, or maybe you just came here to find something to talk about in the reply section. Whatever your reason for being here, you wouldn’t have been able to if your fingers, blood, and/or nervous system refused to obey. The same goes with captains: their team, or in the context of Moby Dick, their crew would not be able to do anything without a voice to follow. However, there would be a little voice in the mind that goes against their wishes. For Ahab, that little voice of reason is Starbuck. When Ahab thought, “They think me mad–Starbuck does,” he isn’t rejecting the warning. This is the first domino to fall before the ship’s fate: as the more these two bicker, the higher chance the ship would split before Moby Dick the whale is back in the action. This reveals how obsession overrides reason and sets the crew to an inevitable downfall. The type of captain matters far more than being charismatic, and much like the captains, leadership in the historical and modern context are just as vulnerable to emotions.

During that time, royalty and those that could taste that similar power were often indulging in said power. Melville’s warning still resonates today: a leader driven by obsession leads their followers to ruin. Our politics, our social circles, our families, our social media circles like influencers, there is a reason why there are followers. For Captain Ahab, his followers are the crew of the Pequod, and with one incentive, he managed to convert regular sailors and whalehunters into soldiers to do his bidding. This is what Melville criticizes about authority: awareness without restraint, paired with obsession, is just another form of power that can destroy the very people meant to be protected.

Midterm Essay : Close Reading #1

Chapter 42, The Whiteness of the Whale, of Moby Dick is possibly the most important chapter in the entire novel. Melville’s writing throughout the book is so extremely intentional, yet the writing within this chapter is arguably the most purposeful and meaningful. Within this chapter, Ishmael speaks to the audience and tries to explain how his biggest fear when it comes to the titular whale is the whiteness of it. He ends his lamentation about the concept of whiteness with the quote “Or is it, that as an essence whiteness is not as much a color as the visible absence of color, and at the same time the concrete of all colors, is it for these reasons that there is such a dumb blankness, dull of meaning, in a wide landscape of snows – a colorless, all-color of atheism from which we shrink?” (Melville, page 212) Ishmael’s direct communication of his thoughts with the readers results in the readers themselves questioning what they may think they know about the world, allowing us to truly look at the whole journey within the story of Moby Dick from a broader, more real world perspective rather than it just being a fictional fantasy.

Breaking down this passage, the first part “Or is it, that as an essence whiteness is not as much a color as the visible absence of color, and at the same time the concrete of all colors” is a truly poignant and thought provoking sentiment. Ishmael presents the concept of whiteness in general as something that is unexplainable, that is incomprehensible. The color white on the surface seems to be just a complete void, something that contains nothing, not even color. Ishmael presents this as one of the main terrors of whiteness. He is provoking the readers to think about how something that is not a thing that exists, but rather is the complete lack of existence whatsoever is not something that should be worshiped or admired. He then adds on to that, immediately introducing the idea that at the same time, whiteness can also be the amalgamation of all color at once. This may seem like a counteraction, but it is intentional. He is presenting us with the fact that this concept of whiteness is something that is so devoid of any possible reasoning or explanation. He is purposefully being confusing because he is trying to emphasize just how terrifying this concept is when people blindly chase after it. There is a true terror in looking up to and worshiping something that is just incomprehensible.

The next section, “is it for these reasons that there is such a dumb blankness, dull of meaning, in a wide landscape of snows – a colorless, all-color of atheism from which we shrink?” Ishamel poses the question about how the inexplicable nature of the idea of whiteness could be the reason so much of what we see is simply devoid of any particular meaning. He impactfully includes the imagery of a “wide landscape of snows” to put in perspective to the readers how truly enormous this concept can be. The vision of  just a complete white out of snow just stretching forever really can put that terror into perspective. It truly shows just how vast and unknown that landscape is. The complete blindness that comes in that situation is what makes it terrifying, all you can see is the white of the snow, completely oblivious and ignorant to whatever else may be happening. This is extremely reflective in those who worship whiteness as a concept. They are so blinded by the color, or lack thereof, that they are rendered ignorant to anything else. Ishmael is utilizing this imagery to really emphasize to the readers just how the terror that exists with whiteness is because so often people associate it with the complete opposite. He compares this concept of whiteness to “a colorless, all-color of atheism”. This comparison may seem like just an off handed comment surrounded by more meaningful ones, but he uses it intentionally. Atheism is the lack of belief or faith in regards to religion or the existence of a god. Ishmael amounts these concepts to one another because the concept of whiteness, in which he argues, is essentially the same thing. A complete devoidness of the existence of anything. He is attempting to instill this understanding in the audience about how whiteness does not mean anything because it does not have any definitive purpose or explanation, just as atheism does not present itself with any definitive belief or faith. The concept of the color white is so often associated with faith and religion and purity, that by Ishmael providing it in the context of the complete opposite thing, atheism, he impactfully juxtaposes that association. He challenges the way in which we think. He also utilizes this comparison because of the fear it brings. He explicitly states within this section that when it comes to the idea and concept of atheism, it is something that everyone shrinks away from. Just the idea brings about an inherent fear to those who hold a faith. Faith and religion are things that are so important and essential to people’s lives and is also an essential concept within the novel. With introducing the concept of atheism by utilizing it as a vessel of comparison to the concept of whiteness, it puts this terror that Ishmael is trying to emphasize in a different context. One that a broader audience might understand. 

This passage is one of the most important in the entire novel. Ishmael presents to the readers a concept so devoid of meaning that it ends up being more meaningful than any other. He argues throughout this that truly nothing else matters if we cannot understand just how absurd it is to chase after and worship a concept that does not even exist itself. Melville, through the voice of Ishamel, is so intentional with every single word he writes. His use of comparison, imagery, and juxtaposition in this passage truly emphasizes the point he is trying to get across to the broadest audience possible. The white whale and Ishmael’s fear of it serves truly as a symbol for the audience and without this section, this symbol would not hold the same understanding or meaning.

With God as My Witness…[Essay #1]

In chapter 34 of Moby Dick, Melville uses biblical allusions and the relation of royalty to God to describe Captain Ahab in order to emphasize the importance and power this character will have on the direction of the narrative. 

The power of God is one that is built upon faith, and in many aspects, this is similar to the role of a ship captain—with the crew putting their faith in the captain’s ability to lead them during their time on the ocean. If we consider the Ocean as a sort of religious experience, it opens the possibility for those who are conduits of this experience to guide this journey.

Ahab’s mysterious characterization not only suggests his importance to the narrative but also frames him as a representative of a prophet of God. In this case the captain becomes a prophet dedicated to the water, and much like Jesus Christ guiding the religious experience of his disciples—Captain Ahab will guide the crew on their journey through the ocean. 

This characterization of Ahab as a prophet is evident in the first dinner scene with his crew, which was intended to allude to the biblical scene of Jesus and the Last Supper. 

“Over his ivory inlaid table, Ahab presided like a mute maned sea-lion on the white coral beach, surrounded by his war like but still deferential cubs…They were little children before Ahab; and yet in Ahab, there seemed not to lurk the smallest social arrogance.” (162).  

Using this biblical allusion the scene paints a picture of regality and unity among a common leader situated amongst them. 

The particular language used is purposeful to elevate Ahab above his crew without necessarily demeaning them. Comparing Ahab to a sea-lion surrounded by cubs positions him in a place of not only power but of protection. Demonstrating the captain’s obligations to the crew and the seriousness and which he takes this position The second sentiment, which compares the crew to his children also echoes this idea of protection but brings in a more religious aspect. In the bible, those who follow the word of the Lord are considered “children of God.” This specific use of the word “children” in this phrase, is meant to emulate that same sort of spiritual presence of unity under one God. For the shipmates—that unity is under Ahab.

His character is positioned as someone with a power and status likened to Godhood. Therefore, he has the precedent of ultimate authority on his ship. In addition, the status of a ship captain being positioned as a prophet of God, indirectly frames ship captains above regal authority. 

“To have been Belshazzar, King of Babylon…therein certainly must have been some touch of mundane grandeur. But he who is the rightly regal and intelligent spirit presides over his own private dinner table of invited guests, that man’s unchallenged power and dominion of individual influences for the time; that man’s royalty of state transcends Belshazzar’s” (162). 

This sentiment encapsulates the idea of the captain holding a higher rank than even that of royalty due to the prestige and respect he has gained from those whom he presides over. 

Considering that royalty is a God given state, it positions God above the royals, and in this context, the captain is above them as well. 

The language used to describe this state is also specifically biblical, showing that the power is that of a spiritual nature as well as the hierarchy of roles. Although there may be social equality on the ship, there is still a hierarchy that is maintained by the roles of crew. The “unchallenged power” of Ahab as captain is what reinforces his power on top of the hierarchy. The reference to the idea of a “dominion” also comes from the biblical sense of authority that has been given by God to govern or steward over the land or in this case, to govern the ship on the ocean. This directly links the role of captain to that of a prophet of religion, governing its own individual dominion. Situating the status of captain as being that of something godly but not all power. 

As the story progresses, Ahab will be the one to lead them on the hunt—with the power to steer the direction of their destinies. The question now is whether he’ll lead them towards glory and heaven or hardship and hell. 

In the original story of Jesus Christ, his unwavering beliefs are what lead the people of Bethlehem, and one of his own disciples to turn on him—resulting in his horrific drawn-out death in the end. 

If Ahab is to continue mirroring Jesus Christ the prophet, there is a good chance that Ahab’s obsessive mission to kill the White Whale will be a death sentence. This reflection also hints at the possibility of a mutiny on the ship, since Jesus Christ was also betrayed by his fellow disciple, Judas. So far in the novel, the only opposition we’ve had against Ahab’s mission has been Starbuck. This detail could possibly foreshadow escalating tensions on the ship that can potentially lead to this mutiny. However, as of now, Ahab is the titular character who possesses the most power over the narrative. He is literally driving the direction of our characters’ fates by guiding the ship towards its destiny. 

However, considering that the biblical allusion seems to be comparing Ahab to the likes of Jesus, this ultimately leads me to believe that his fate, and that of his crew will end in the same tragic style of the death of Jesus.