Last semester, I broke my biggest rule I have regarding novels, that being no writing in them, no exceptions whatsoever. For whatever reason, I was overcome with feelings for the novel, and was compelled by the novel itself to write within it. It is thanks to Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Grey that I now feel comfortable with annotating my novels; highlighting, writing, anything I feel is needed in the moment. Typically, it comes from this overwhelming feeling deep within me to tell someone of this moment. However, with no one to turn to, my notes app glares my way! Even this did not satisfy my seemingly insatiable need to convey this information within myself to another. I think what Professor Pressman has said has forever changed how I view annotating, but also captured what it was that I was seeking in that moment. I was seeking another to share my thoughts, but who better to share these thoughts with than the other themselves? As Professor has said, we are writing back to the author through the act and art of annotating. It was in that moment that I needed to write to Wilde, and that has very much stayed with me as time moves forward. If Dorian Grey was tempting me to write within his pages, then Moby-Dick is practically begging to be written in!

On this page, I wrote about the relationship I noticed between the biblical story of Eve and her temptation by the apple. I felt as though Ishmael had begun to be tempted in a similar way to Queequeg, especially as a Christian man. The highlighted segments point to areas that made me think of something else; not in a way of “I wish I were reading x or watching y right now”, but more of a possible connection to something else, whether it be an academic idea or more of a fun idea, as we see on the following image.

In the final page of chapter 10–everyone’s favourite chapter, I’m sure–shows how far Ishmael has fallen for Queequeg. He WAS a good Christian, he let Queequeg place tobacco and fifteen dollars in silver into his pockets, to which I replied, as I’m sure everyone else did, by writing “BOTTOM!” on the top of the page. Here, I saw Ishmael allowing Queequeg to do whatever it is he wanted. It echoed similar feelings I had when I read Catcher in the Rye, in that both of these characters say one thing, but never follow through, often times becoming walking contradictions and massive hypocrites. In this case, Ishmael becomes such by speaking of his religion and lamenting sleeping with Queequeg initially to the manager at the inn where they met. He speaks of his religion and his conviction to not trusting “cannibals”, and yet here he is, putty in Queequeg’s hands. The underlined section is what the written note refers to, but it is also a note to close read the language used, as he is letting it happen, not that Queequeg forced this upon him to a rejection, but an acceptance of Queequeg’s ways, at least the very first sprouting of such a relationship that flowers throughout the novel.
Through taking this class, the use of different pen colours and highlighters seems mandatory in order to cover everything one wants to examine on reread. In doing such annotations, it becomes a conversation that then helps the reader understand the text more, allowing for deeper conversations and writings on the novel, all through conversing with Melville in the margins of our novels. What I’ve gained from this exercise is how each and every time we read, the novel becomes an adaptation. We all read and understand differently, no matter how slight, and this shows best in the annotations of the novel. I cannot imagine how others annotated, especially with sticky notes, that is seemingly impossible for me! It’s a great reminder that we are all so different but that creates the spice of life, as they say. Learning from one other through our differing ways of thinking only helps us grow, not only as students, but as people!












