Chapter Ten

In these chapters of Moby-Dick, Melville offers us a deeper look into the relationship between Ishmael and Queequeg. We could interpret their connection as more than a simple growing friendship; there are elements of a romantic bond, as described by Melville. This interpretation is particularly interesting given the cultural context of the 19th century, where queer relationships were rarely, if ever, represented openly in literature. Seeing such intimacy written in this novel, in this way, can show how people at that time resisted or ignored the possibility of a queer narrative. In modern day, we are more exposed to queer narratives and can easily point out when artwork is queer; unlike in the 19th century, when representation was kept minimal.

Chapter 10 especially emphasizes both the physical and emotional closeness between Ishmael and Queequeg. Ishmael describes how Queequeg “pressed his forehead against mine, clasped me around the waist, and said that henceforth we were married.” (Melville 57) The way that Melville worded this is striking, not only for its tenderness, but also for implying a relational permanency between the two with the term “married”. Later, Ishmael continues, “thus, then, in our hearts’ honeymoon, lay I and Queequeg — a cosy, loving pair.” (Melville 28) These scenes show the intimacy between the two sailors, hinting at a relationship rooted in devotion to one another. 

What makes this chapter especially significant is not only the intimate dedication between Ishmael and Queequeg, but also the way their bond has been understood—or dismissed—over time. Some readers see their relationship as purely platonic, reflecting the deep companionships sailors often formed, while others interpret the affectionate and even erotic language as evidence of a queer connection. How readers respond to these passages depends greatly on the cultural lens of the time. In the 19th century, queerness was rarely acknowledged; the term “homosexuality” itself was not coined until the late 19th century, as early as the 1960s, according to the Stanford Encyclopedia — about 10 years after the release of Moby-Dick. This does not mean that queer relationships did not exist, but rather that society lacked the language and openness to recognize them. Reading Moby-Dick today, in a time when queer relationships are more visible and celebrated, allows us to see possibilities in Ishmael and Queequeg’s intimacy that may have been overlooked in earlier years. This contrast across time highlights how literature can be reinterpreted by different audiences, reflecting changed understandings.

Moby-Dick Extracts

It is interesting to see the different extracts presented at the beginning of the novel and to see that various ways that humans try to understand the sperm whale. One quote that stood out to me states: “Mad with the agonies he endures from these fresh attacks, the infuriated Sperm Whale rolls over and over; he rears his enormous head, and with wide expanded jaw snaps at everything around him; he rushes at the boats with his head; they are propelled before him vast swiftness, and sometimes utterly destroyed.” (Currents and Whaling. U.S. Ex. Ex., 49) Every description of the whale in these extracts depicts it as a violent monster, even though the whales themselves are not inherently dangerous creatures – it is humans that bring out the worst in them. These extracts show us insight on what men were struggling with: the very idea of the whale. 

In reality, these creatures are usually calm and placid, spending most of their time in the deep ocean, rarely interacting with humans. It is also important to consider early 19th-century whaling practices, which were both an economic necessity and a dangerous pursuit to men. They depended on these creatures to provide for them but also feared them, which can be contradicting. Humans go out of their way to hunt for these creatures then act shocked when they retaliate, painting them as a vicious monster when, in truth, it is humans who embodied monstrosity. This can be seen as a form of projection: men frame the whale as the aggressor rather than acknowledge int their roles as intruders, which reveals more about human arrogance than it does about fear of the whale itself. 

This contrast between the whale’s natural behavior and the monstrous image that humans impose on the creature can possibly show a reflection onto what “Moby-Dick” has to offer. It will be interesting to see how humanity’s fear of the unknown and our tendencies to project violence onto the natural world plays a role throughout the novel. 

Steve Mentz Extra Credit in DH Center

Attending Steve Mentz’ seminar in the Digital Humanities Center was very insightful. One idea that I liked that he brought up is that water is an ominous present in our environment and his curiosity on moving blue humanities beyond the ocean and thinking about other materials like rain, humidity, lakes, ice, etc. There are so many various sources of water that influence human identity. Not everybody has access to the ocean but they do have access to drinking water or fog or a lake nearby them. Everyone can participate in blue humanities beyond the ocean. I feel like for some it can be hard to relate to “Moby-Dick” in a blue humanities way since they don’t live by the ocean, but it doesn’t matter, they are still reading about it participating in the discussion. Water, in a blue humanities context, doesn’t have to be physically there, it can be present in literature, art and other cultural expressions. Mentz also briefly brings up global climate change impacting waters. I feel like now more than ever it is important to have these discussions regarding water. We need water, we can’t live without water. It is important to appreciate what we have and to not take it for granted. His seminar had made me more excited to read “Moby-Dick” and see how the narrative of the ocean is portrayed. Do they disregard it or appreciate it? It will also be interesting to see their interactions with the ocean. Overall, this seminar and class discussion was very insightful!

Andrew Delbanco Introduction to Moby-Dick

In his introduction, Andrew Delbanco proposes the idea that Moby-Dick “is a book of universal reach about the neediness of men when they are denied the props of rank and custom; a book about what can happen to men in conditions of radical exposure.” (Delbanco 23) This idea to me reminds us that Melville’s novel is not simply about whaling but about the fragility of human beings when societal structures are stripped away from us. People rely on these “props of rank and custom” – social hierarchies, traditions, and institutions – to give them identity and purpose. When these “props” are gone, individuals find themselves exposed and vulnerable, forced to find a purpose by themselves, which can cause social conflict and loss of identity. 

I feel like the setting of the ocean helps intensify this theme. At sea, crews are radically isolated, they are cut off from the stabilization that lands provide. Crewmates are their only support available, but these relationships can be fragile due to each individual’s intentions, like their selfishness or corruption, for instance. Delbanco states that Melville highlights how easily individuals can become needy when stripped of their “ranks” in society. It will be interesting to see how this is reflecting onto the novel and see how the crew mates interact with one another. What betrayal and mischief will occur?

Delbanco also emphasizes the importance of politics in this novel. The ship functions as an allegory for America, representing a diverse and unstable nation struggling with race, class, and authority. He mentions that the ship gathers many different people from different backgrounds, yet hierarchies are still present and favor white men. The ship reflects the fragility of American democracy and the individuals a part of that democracy. It is interesting because, although we -arguably- have advanced as a society, we still carry some of those ideals. White men are still at the top of the societal ladder. It will be interesting to read this novel and see how it is still impactful today. By stripping away the “props” of everyday society and forcing them to recreate it on the ship, Melville exposes the instability of political and social life, which makes Moby-Dick more than just whaling, it is both a psychological study and a political allegory of America. 

Questions For Steve Mentz (Extra Credit)

  1. You talk about climate change and rising sea levels, how can blue humanities help us think different about our current ecological challenges?
  2. What drew you to study blue humanities?
  3. Which other works do you think captures the poetics of water?
  4. How do you balance the reality of water, like rising sea levels and pollution, with the symbolic meaning of water? Does material reality and symbolism overlap?
  5. What connections are there between blue humanities and environmental justice?

What “Moby-Dick” Can Mean to Us

In Philip Hoare’s article, “What ‘Moby-Dick’ Means to Me”, he reflects on how his relationship with “Moby-Dick” has transformed over time and explains how a “difficult” text can transform into different meanings when approached at various periods of your life; he suggests that classic literature has less of a fixed meaning but instead has an evolving relationship between the text and reader. He admits, “I didn’t know then what I do now: that ‘Moby-Dick’ can be whatever you want it to be. It took me thirty years to discover what the book was – or what it was not.” (Para. 2) That is the beauty of literature; while words remain the same, how you perceive and interpret the text can change every time you read it, since you are constantly evolving. Hoare once dismissed “Moby-Dick” as “wordy worthiness” (Para. 2) compared to John Huston’s film, but later came to describe it as“an act of transference…a sui-generis creation, one that came into the world as an unnatural, immaculate conception.” (Para. 4) His transformation shows that the perception of the book can change depending on where you are in life. This is relatable to me. If you asked me to read “Moby-Dick” 5 years ago, I probably would not have batted an eye, but I feel like a different person than I was 5 years ago. I am more open to change and welcome new experiences and perspectives on life. Our life experiences are constantly changing us; classic literature has gained its enduring relevance by being able to be rediscovered at different times, offering a fresh meaning each time we reread it. As Hoare observes, “oceanic reach and perverse digression provide endless sources of inspiration and interpretation” (Para. 10) and that “Moby-Dick” “reads like something that was written before books were invented, yet it is utterly modern.” (Para. 9) As long as we constantly evolving as individuals, we will continue to gain new experiences and inspiration. This can be from nature or from the different forms of media that we are consuming. Like him, I see that great works are not static texts but companions that grow alongside us. 

Ralph Waldo Emerson, “The American Scholar”

Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “The American Scholar” captivated me by addressing the concerns about intellectual idleness fostered by American society. He calls for the revival of the scholar as an original thinker of the present, not merely an echo of the past, to help unite a divided society. Although this was written in 1837, it is still prevalent today. With technology becoming an integral part of everyday lives, it is crucial to become unsaturated with technology and develop our own critical thoughts. The emergence of influencers on social media can make it harder to form our own opinions about even the simplest of things.

Emerson opens his speech by noting “the sluggard intellect of this continent” (Para. 1), emphasizing his belief that America’s dependence on European ideas had stifled intellectual progress in the nation. I noted this wording because it seems that Emerson is deliberately provoking his audience, hoping that people will take it as a challenge and start a new age in America, one that revives literature and independent thought. Before the emergence of social media, society could have independent thoughts; everyone seemed to have individuality. I felt like this speech was still necessary today; people should be more open to various thoughts to understand themselves better.

Emerson highlights the importance of individualism as a key to building a stronger society. He believes those who can govern themselves and think independently can contribute to a more unified society rather than a divided society ruled by social classes or ideals. He concludes “the world is nothing, the man is all.” (Para. 47) The conclusion of his speech intrigued me, and I thought that the quote was perfect for modern society – it is essential for an individual’s inner self and potential. It dismisses material things, like societal structures, and emphasizes individual power and inner strength. Emerson accentuates his conviction that progress begins with the individual scholar’s ability to think freely and connect with others, which is still a quintessential proclamation today. This speech is very much still relevant in today’s society, and I hope that as a society, we can go back to this text and continue to learn and progress from it.

Introduction to ECL 522

Hello everyone! My name is Liz Martin (she/her/hers) and it is my first year at San Diego State University and I am majoring in English. I transferred here from Shasta College, which is located in Redding, CA. I lived in Redding for most of my life so I am excited to change it up and explore some new connections and experiences here in San Diego for a little while. I am very grateful that I have the opportunity to expand my knowledge here at SDSU and I cannot wait to take part in this class! 

A few things about me are that I am a cat person, I currently have three cats that I have adopted, a calico, a tuxedo, and a ginger cat. I enjoy going on hikes and going to the gym. I also enjoy reading and watching films. A few of my favorite books include Gone Girl, My Year of Rest and Relaxation, and Pride and Prejudice. A few of my favorite films include Funny Face, Paris, Texas, and Fantastic Mr. Fox. I also enjoy going to concerts, two of my favorites have been Taylor Swift and Ariana Grande, I love the pop girls. 

I can’t wait to read Moby Dick and learn more about it through others’ thoughts and opinions, thank you! 

Picture of me 🙂