Tag Archives: whales

Death by Spermaceti

Posted on by
1

One part of the reading for this week that I took interest with was the end of Cistern and Buckets. This whole chapter was action packed, detailed, a jump from the lull of Melville’s technical and historical chapters. Although Tashtego is saved by Queequeg (in a midwifery way), Melville still fantasizes about an alternate reality where this rebirth did not occur. “Now, had Tashtego perished in that head, it has been a very precious perishing; smothered in the very whitest and daintiest of fragrant spermaceti; coffined, hearsed, and tombed in the secret inner chamber and sanctum sanctorum of the whale. Only one sweeter end can be readily recalled” (p.377). This feels like a romanticization of death, one that contrasts strongly with the death of the whales in subsequent chapters. These deaths are violent, painful, pitiful, and blood baths, covered in red. Tashtego’s death, comparatively, would have been covered in white–the color of purity, honor, fear, existentialism. And maybe that is exactly what being smothered in this white would represent, the honor of dying in the whaling industry, of dying in a masculine way, yet also the fear and existentialism that comes with death, of the unknown of what follows when the biological functions cease. 

The language used in this passage is light for such a heavy topic. “Precious”, “daintiest”, “sweeter”, romanticize this death as if it is something to be desired. This romanticization is only possible because Ishmael (and other crew) would not have witnessed this death, would not have witnessed Tashtego’ fright and slow drowning in the spermaceti. When spared the details of seeing what happens, it is easy to romanticize the results–as Melville often argues about the landsmen who reap the rewards of the whaling industry with none of the suffering. 

This idea of Tashtego’s death is calm, slow, peaceful, unlike the thrashing the whales undergo. We can draw metaphors here to how we think about nature and animals in a hierarchical fashion, underneath us and allowed to suffer in death. Or we can draw a metaphor for slavery, for how the whales are allowed to die as slaves are, while the humans will die these white, painless, precious deaths. 

I enjoy learning about the White Sperm Whale.

Posted on by
Reply

This novel has been putting me in a chokehold for quite some time because of how slowly it progresses throughout the chapters. There are some chapters where I was like: “What the hell is going on?” and there are chapters where I yelp with excitement, especially the one chapter called Moby Dick, which is chapter 45. The reason why this chapter excites me is that we all get to learn about the White Sperm Whale, and its dangerous intentions while lurking under the sea. There is this one passage where Ishmael states, “The Sperm Whale is in some cases sufficiently powerful, knowing, and judiciously malicious, as with direct aforethought to stave in, utterly destroy, and sink a large ship; and what is more, the Sperm Whale has done it.” (224). What is really interesting about this chapter is that it prompts readers to think about how dangerous the whale is. However, there are more details than just that. Melville purposefully uses Ishmael’s and other whalemen’s perspectives to show the danger that this Sperm Whale causes to humans, while he never points out the danger that humans pose to the Sperm Whale. In my mind, I believe that humans were the ones who inflicted damage on the Sperm Whales first, then, from the Sperm Whales’ perspective, they believe that humans pose to them as threats, which is why they attack large ships, chase after these ships, and destroy them to prevent future disaster for their species. I believe that, just like dolphins, whales are actually really smart beings. It remembers faces and is aware that ships that sailed are meant to attack them, which prompts me with a question: Are Sperm Whales considered to be as malicious as Ishmael claims it to be? Or it was the humans that caused this, and the whales are just simply protecting themselves. For humans, hunting a whale is literally a huge achievement because they get recognized for killing one. It’s the whalemen’s dream to be able to hunt a whale, and that ambitious desire turns them into heartless human beings because they are slaying tons of whales just for that purpose alone. I love learning about Sperm Whales, and the human perspectives are trying to convince readers to bear that same hatred towards these whales because of their maliciousness. But I want to look at it from a different perspective, and it’s really amazing to be able to look at things from different sides.

The Whiteness of the Whale

Posted on by
1

I find myself coming back over and over to chapter 42 “The Whiteness of the Whale” trying to decipher what it could mean. The last paragraph is pointing me in the direction of this whiteness being a kind of blank canvas for us to project our own thoughts and meanings upon. Melville asks “or is it, that as in essence whiteness is not so much a color as the visible absence of color, and at the same time the concrete of all colors; is it for these reasons that there is such a dumb blankness, full of meaning, in a wide landscape of snows– a colorless, all-color of atheism from which we shrink?” (212). What’s striking to me here is the contrast which Melville seems to love: this absence of, yet concrete of all colors, the “colorless, all-color”. It seems that this whiteness is another of the unanswerable questions, ungraspable phantoms of life that we are left to define for ourselves. This “dumb blankness, full of meaning” is nothing yet everything at the same time.

I’m sure there’s a better or more technical term for this, but I’m imagining this whiteness as a zero, its in this neutral state, without any “subtile deceits” of color, but it has the potential to go anywhere? It’s why white can be seen as pure, innocent, noble, even divine, but at the same time there’s this uneasiness because of its association to ghostly apparitions and overall the emptiness that it suggests. The whiteness of the whale suggests more about us than the whale itself, which we see in Ahab’s decision that this whale is everything that is evil as he projects all of his hatred and anger upon it, while others such as Ishmael continue to question the conflicting feelings that this whiteness puts upon us, perhaps a way of showing the indefinite nature of life itself.

An Incomplete Cetology and Humanity

Posted on by
3

When I first read this book, I remember skimming through the “Cetology” chapter, disregarding it as one of Ishmael’s many ramblings because I was bored, annoyed, confused, and didn’t “get it”. Admittedly this chapter, and a large chunk of this book, still maintains those qualities but that’s exactly the reason why I wanted to dissect some of the quotes in chapter 32. Before providing us with this makeshift dictionary on whales, Ishmael says “I promise nothing complete; because any human thing supposed to be complete, must for that very reason infallibly be faulty” (147). Having discussed his willingness to change his mind about Queequeg and witnessed his desire to continue to learn about the world, this seemed like a very Ishmael thing to say. By preceding with this, he shows us that “any human thing” should always remain open to change in order to progress/grow; to claim completion is a disservice to the very nature of being alive, for to live is to change. Our ideals, perspectives, values, our LIVES are not set in stone, we should constantly evolve and learn from past experiences lest we be faulty by denying our incompletion. It’s a very fitting contrast to Ahab whose “infinity of firmest fortitude” and “fixed and fearless, forward dedication” keeps him on this path, uncaring for anything else as his mind is set on nothing but destroying Moby Dick (135).

The chapter ends with Ishmael’s “cetological System standing thus unfinished, even as the great Cathedral of Cologne was left, with the crane still standing upon the top of the uncompleted tower. For small erections may be finished by their first architects; grand ones, true ones, ever leave the copestone to posterity. God keep me from ever completing anything” (157). Again, the value of leaving things unfinished is shown by Ishmael here; it also shows how his meeting with Queequeg changed his whole attitude towards life, in chapter 2 he was saying “it’s too late to make any improvements now. The universe is finished” (12). Ishmael is showing us how vital it is to change our minds and accept the incomplete nature of life. We can’t have a complete dictionary of these whales, and there is no definitive description of how to live. They’re meant to be interpreted in many ways, added upon by each generation and their encounters; any reading with one singular message would simply be propaganda (this last part doesn’t really make sense in this context but I just wanted to add it because I’ve been thinking about this since our professor said it).